National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Modifies Order in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Case. The Tribunal recognized the significance of ongoing arbitration proceedings in determining the corporate debtor's assets and restored an earlier interim order.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by the suspended director of a corporate debtor, M/s. Barasat Krishnagar Expressways Ltd., challenging an order that admitted the corporate debtor to Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The corporate debtor was engaged in a contract for laying roads on a Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) basis, but faced difficulties due to land acquisition disputes, leading to the termination of the contract and invocation of arbitration against the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI). The arbitration proceedings were complicated by the death of the arbitrator and subsequent Supreme Court intervention, which appointed a new arbitrator. The Tribunal initially modified its order in August 2026, but upon reviewing the circumstances, recognized that the corporate debtor's only asset was contingent on the arbitration outcome. The Tribunal decided to restore the earlier order from January 2024, allowing the arbitration to proceed without interference. The appeal was scheduled for further hearing in December 2026, and the interim order from January 2024 was continued until then.

Headnote

A) Corporate Law - Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - Modification of Admission Order - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 7 - The Tribunal modified its earlier order admitting the corporate debtor to CIRP, recognizing the importance of the arbitration proceedings in determining the corporate debtor's assets. The Tribunal held that the previous order complicated the situation and restored the earlier interim order to allow the arbitration process to conclude (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order admitting the corporate debtor to Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) should be modified.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal modified its earlier order and restored the interim order from January 2024, allowing the arbitration proceedings to continue without interference. The appeal was scheduled for further hearing on 15.12.2026.

Law Points

  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
  • Arbitration
  • Modification of Orders
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (10) 106

Comp App (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 453/2023

2026-10-27

Justice N. Seshasayee, Jatindranath Swain

Mr. S. Ravi, Ms. Geeta Battula, Mr. A. V. Arun, Mr. M. Rama Rao

Goda Ganesh

State Bank of India & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the admission of a corporate debtor to CIRP.

Remedy Sought

Modification of the order admitting the corporate debtor to CIRP.

Filing Reason

Challenging the order due to complications arising from arbitration proceedings.

Previous Decisions

An earlier order admitting the corporate debtor to CIRP was modified in August 2026.

Issues

Modification of admission order under CIRP Impact of arbitration on corporate debtor's assets

Submissions/Arguments

The corporate debtor's only asset is contingent on the arbitration outcome. The modification of the order complicated the situation regarding the corporate debtor's assets.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal recognized the significance of ongoing arbitration proceedings in determining the corporate debtor's assets and held that the previous order complicated the situation.

Judgment Excerpts

This application IA No. 1388/2026 is preferred by the suspended director of the corporate debtor, seeking modification of the order dated 03.08.2026. The corporate debtor is a SPV and it has been awarded a contract for laying roads on 'BOT' basis. The order we have passed on 03.08.2026 is more likely to complicate the issue, something we were not aware of when we passed it.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed challenging the order admitting the corporate debtor to CIRP. An interim order was granted on 09.01.2024, which was later modified on 03.08.2026. The current application seeks to restore the earlier order.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Section 7
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals on Tax Arrears Settlement and Refund Issues. The Court upheld the applicability of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme to co-noticees while ruling that amounts paid under the Scheme are non-refundable as per Section 93.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Proceedings Against Non-Executive Directors in NI Act Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Mere Designation as Directors Insufficient for Liability Under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.