NCLAT Dismisses Application for Clarification on Property Sale Restrictions. The Tribunal found that subsequent orders sufficiently addressed the issues raised regarding the sale of properties to related parties.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an application filed by Vimla Devi Sawalra and another under Rule 11 of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2016, seeking modification and clarification of an earlier order dated 23rd September 2025 concerning the sale of properties by Shivgyan Developers Pvt Ltd. The applicants argued that the order did not explicitly mention the restriction on selling properties to related parties, which was a point raised during the hearing. The Tribunal noted that the order dated 23rd September recorded the respondents' submission that there was no intention to dispose of properties, but the clarification sought was deemed unnecessary as subsequent orders had already addressed the issue. On 18th November 2025, the Tribunal reiterated that the respondent should not dispose of properties to related parties without the appellant's consent. The Supreme Court later stayed the requirement for consent for stock sales but upheld the undertaking not to sell to related parties. The NCLAT ultimately dismissed the application for clarification, stating that the matter had been sufficiently addressed in subsequent orders. The Tribunal directed that the appeal be decided expeditiously, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Modification of Orders - Clarification of Undertaking - National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2016, Rule 11 - The applicant sought clarification on the order regarding the sale of properties to related parties, asserting that the original order did not reflect this limitation. The Tribunal found no need for further clarification as subsequent orders addressed the matter adequately. Held that the application was dismissed (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order dated 23rd September 2025 required clarification regarding the sale of properties to related parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application for clarification was dismissed as the Tribunal found that subsequent orders had adequately addressed the concerns raised by the applicant.

Law Points

  • Modification of orders
  • Clarification of undertakings
  • Sale of properties to related parties
  • Consent for sale
  • Compliance with previous orders
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (10) 91

I.A.No.5985 of 2025 in Company Appeal (AT) No.118/2025

2026-10-29

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Mr. Barun Mitra, Mr. Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Krishnendu Datta, Mr. Ajay Kumar, Ms Stuti Vatsa, Mr. Vijayant G, Mr. Shreyash Mittal

Vimla Devi Sawalka & Anr

Shivgyan Developers Pvt Ltd & Ors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for modification and clarification of a previous order regarding property sales.

Remedy Sought

Clarification on the order restricting sales to related parties.

Filing Reason

Inadvertent omission of related party reference in the order dated 23rd September 2025.

Previous Decisions

Order dated 23rd September 2025 and subsequent order dated 18th November 2025.

Issues

Whether the order dated 23rd September 2025 required clarification regarding the sale of properties to related parties.

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant argued that the order did not reflect the limitation on sales to related parties. The respondent's counsel stated there was no intention to dispose of properties.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that clarification was unnecessary as subsequent orders sufficiently addressed the issues regarding the sale of properties to related parties.

Judgment Excerpts

The present application, IA No. 5985/2025, is filed by the applicant under Rule 11 of the NCLAT Rules, 2016 seeking modification/clarification of the order dated 23rd September, 2025. Thus the order dated 23.09.2025 merged in the order dated 18.11.2025 passed by us.

Procedural History

The application was filed on 29th October 2026, following the order dated 23rd September 2025 and subsequent orders on 18th November 2025 and 8th December 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules: Rule 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Upholds Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Amidst Disputed Claims. The admission of a Financial Creditor's inflated claim was contested, but the Tribunal upheld the resolution plan approved by the Committe...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Interference in Personal Insolvency Proceedings Under IBC — High Court Exceeded Writ Jurisdiction by Precluding Statutory Mechanism Before Adjudicating Authority Could Determine Debt Existence