National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Recording of Counsel Appearance in Insolvency Appeal. Tribunal Affirms the Importance of Accurate Representation in Judicial Records.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal involved an application to record the appearance of Mr. Krishnendu Dutta, a senior counsel representing Axis Trustee Services Ltd., in a judgment dated 22.09.2026 related to Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1474 of 2026. The application was filed on 15.10.2026, and the counsel for the respondent indicated no objection to the request. The Tribunal, recognizing the importance of maintaining accurate records, agreed to record the appearance of Mr. Dutta in the judgment and directed that a corrected copy of the judgment be uploaded accordingly. The application was subsequently disposed of by the Tribunal, with the officiating chairperson and members present endorsing the decision.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Recording of Appearance - Tribunal's Authority to Record Counsel Appearance - National Company Law Tribunal Act, 2016 - The application sought to record the appearance of counsel for the respondent in the judgment of a previous appeal. The Tribunal allowed the application, affirming the necessity of accurate representation in its records. Held that the appearance should be duly noted in the judgment (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether to record the appearance of counsel for the respondent in the judgment.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal allowed the application to record the appearance of Mr. Krishnendu Dutta on behalf of Respondent No. 1 and directed that a corrected copy of the judgment be uploaded.

Law Points

  • Recording of appearance
  • Insolvency proceedings
  • Tribunal orders
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (10) 86

I.A. No. 7421 of 2026 in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1474 of 2026

2026-10-15

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Barun Mitra, Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Nakul Sachdeva, Mr. Sagar Arora, Mr. Shreyansh Rathi, Ms. Shrinkhla Tiwari, Mr. Abhinandan Sharma, Mr. Karan S., Mr. Varmit, Mr. Harshit Khare, Mr. Prafful Saini, Mr. Ayuj Agrawal, Mr. Bijesh Gupta, Mr. Apoorv Agarwal, Ms. Manvi Jain, Ms. Khyati Sharma

Affle 3i Ltd.

Axis Trustee Services Ltd. & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application to record counsel's appearance in a judgment.

Remedy Sought

Recording of the appearance of counsel for the respondent.

Filing Reason

To ensure accurate representation in the judgment.

Previous Decisions

Judgment dated 22.09.2026 had not recorded the appearance.

Issues

Whether to record the appearance of counsel for the respondent in the judgment.

Submissions/Arguments

Counsel for the respondent had no objection to the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the importance of maintaining accurate records of counsel appearances in judicial proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

This application has been filed to record the appearance of Mr. Krishnendu Dutta, learned Sr. counsel for the respondent. The learned counsel for the respondent appears and has no objection to the same. Application is disposed of.

Procedural History

The application was filed on 15.10.2026 to record counsel's appearance in a prior judgment dated 22.09.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • National Company Law Tribunal Act:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Income Tax Matter — Clarifies Taxability of Interest on Doubtful Advances. The court held that interest on doubtful loans credited to suspense account could not be taxed if the assessee established that the ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge in Company Law Dispute — Jurisdictional Authority of BIFR Affirmed.