National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Reschedules Insolvency Appeals Due to Scheduling Conflict. Tribunal Adjusts Hearing Dates to Ensure Efficient Management of Appeals Under Companies Act, 2013.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal addressed applications for early hearing in two insolvency appeals filed by the Asset Reconstruction Company (India) against the IRPs of Xrbia Warai Developers Pvt. Ltd. and Xrbia North Hinjewadi Developers Pvt. Ltd. The applications sought to expedite the hearing of Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) Nos. 1536 and 1537 of 2025. Initially scheduled for 06.11.2026, the Tribunal noted a conflict with another matter listed at the same time and subsequently rescheduled the hearings to 19th November 2026 at 12:00 PM. The Tribunal also ordered that the interim order previously granted in the appeals would remain in effect until the new hearing date. The applications were disposed of accordingly, ensuring that the parties were informed of the new schedule. The decision reflects the Tribunal's commitment to managing its docket efficiently while ensuring that parties have their matters heard in a timely manner.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Early Hearing - Request for expedited hearing of appeals - Companies Act, 2013 - The Tribunal considered the applications for early hearing of the appeals and rescheduled the hearing date to accommodate existing listings. The interim order previously granted was directed to continue until the next hearing date. Held that the appeals would be heard on the new date set (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Request for early hearing of appeals in insolvency matters

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal rescheduled the hearing of the appeals to 19th November 2026 at 12:00 PM and directed that the interim order shall continue until the next date of hearing.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • early hearing
  • interim orders
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (10) 84

I.A. No. 7133 of 2026 in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1536 of 2025 and I.A. No. 7132 of 2026 in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1537 of 2025

2026-10-14

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Barun Mitra, Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Krishnendu Dutta, Ms. Padhmaja Kaul, Mr. Kushagra Sah, Mr. Azeem Parvez, Mr. Harsh Gurbani

Asset Reconstruction Company (India)

Vikas Gopichand Khiyani, Sanjay Vijay Jeswani

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Insolvency appeals seeking early hearing

Remedy Sought

Early hearing of appeals

Filing Reason

Request for expedited hearing due to scheduling conflict

Previous Decisions

Initial hearing scheduled for 06.11.2026

Issues

Request for early hearing of insolvency appeals

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant sought expedited hearing due to scheduling conflict Respondent to be informed of new hearing date

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the importance of managing its schedule effectively while ensuring timely hearings in insolvency matters.

Judgment Excerpts

These applications have been filed praying for seeking early hearing let it be listed now on 19th November, 2026 at 12:00 PM The interim order already granted in the appeals, shall continue till the next date of hearing.

Procedural History

Applications I.A. Nos. 7133 & 7132 of 2026 filed for early hearing; initial hearing set for 06.11.2026; rescheduled to 19.11.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Upholds Claim for Pay Scale Parity for Private Secretaries to Judges. Disparity in Pay Scales for Private Secretaries to Judges and Government Secretaries Found, Requiring Review Under Article 229.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal in Eviction Case Due to Landlord's Bona Fide Necessity. Tenant's Claim of Hardship Rejected as Landlord's Need for Premises Established Under Section 13(1)(h) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Evic...