NCLAT Allows Appeal in Insolvency Proceedings Due to Lack of Notice. Dismissal of Delay Condonation Application Set Aside as Appellant Not Properly Notified of Listings.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal filed by Shiv Nandi Investments Pvt. Ltd. against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) dismissing their application for condonation of delay in filing a claim as a homebuyer. The appellant had initially filed an application (IA No.6027 of 2025) seeking to condone a delay of 468 days, which was dismissed for default on 12.12.2025. Subsequent applications for recall of the dismissal were also dismissed for default. The last application (RA - 82 of 2026) was dismissed on 01.09.2026, with the NCLT noting the appellant's lack of seriousness in pursuing the remedy. However, the appellant's counsel argued that they had not received any notice regarding the listings of their applications. The NCLAT, considering the appellant's status as a homebuyer and the implications of procedural fairness, allowed the appeal, set aside the NCLT's order, and directed that the matter be reconsidered. The court imposed a cost of Rs.20,000 to be paid to the Corporate Debtor for the purposes of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The application was to be listed before the NCLT on a fixed date.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Condonation of Delay - Dismissal of Application - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - The appeal was allowed as the appellant, a homebuyer, claimed not to have received notice for the listing of his application, which led to its dismissal. The court emphasized the need for procedural fairness and directed that the matter be reconsidered by the NCLT. Held that the dismissal was not justified due to lack of notice (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dismissal of the application for condonation of delay was justified given the appellant's claims of not receiving notice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The NCLAT allowed the appeal, set aside the order dated 01.09.2026, and directed the NCLT to reconsider the application, imposing a cost of Rs.20,000 to be paid to the Corporate Debtor.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • delay condonation
  • homebuyer rights
  • procedural fairness
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (10) 57

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1900 of 2026

2026-10-07

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Barun Mitra, Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Sumant Batra, Mr. Sarthak Bhandari, Ms. Riya Kaur Arora, Mr. Abhishek Anand, Mr. Karan Kohli, Ms. Palak Kalra

Shiv Nandi Investments Pvt. Ltd.

Devendra Umrao

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of application for condonation of delay in insolvency proceedings.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to have the dismissal of their application set aside.

Filing Reason

The appellant claimed not to have received notice for the listing of their application.

Previous Decisions

The NCLT had dismissed multiple applications for default prior to the appeal.

Issues

Whether the dismissal of the application for condonation of delay was justified Whether the appellant was properly notified of the application listings

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that they did not receive notice for the listings. The respondent contended that the appellant was not serious in pursuing the remedy.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and the right to be notified in insolvency proceedings, particularly for homebuyers.

Judgment Excerpts

The facts are IA No.6027 of 2025 was preferred by the Applicant seeking condonation of delay of 468 days in filing the claim as a homebuyer before the Resolution Professional. Considering the fact the Appellant is a homebuyer, though an institutional one, in the interest of justice, we allow this Appeal.

Procedural History

The appellant filed IA No.6027 of 2025 for condonation of delay, which was dismissed for default on 12.12.2025. Subsequent applications for recall were also dismissed for default, culminating in the dismissal of RA - 82 of 2026 on 01.09.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Clarifies Non-Entitlement to Back Wages in Service Termination Case. The court confirmed that the respondent was not entitled to back wages as neither the Single Judge nor the Division Bench had directed such payment.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Claims in Arbitration Dispute — Jurisdiction of Indian Courts Affirmed. The court ruled that the proper law of the contract is Indian law, and thus, the applicability of Part I of the Arbitration Act, 1996 is not e...