NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Dismisses Appeal Against NCLT Order on Resolution Plan. The court upheld that minority homebuyers lack locus standi to challenge a resolution plan approved by a majority vote under Section 30(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed against an order from the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) which dismissed an application under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The appellants, a group of 11 homebuyers, sought to challenge the discriminatory treatment in the resolution plan and demanded equal treatment with other homebuyers. They had entered into a Builder Buyer Agreement in 2007 but had not been allotted any specific flat or space. The NCLT found that the appellants constituted a minor percentage of the homebuyer class and were represented by an Authorized Representative. The NCLT cited the Supreme Court's ruling in Jaypee Kensington Boulevard Apartments Welfare Association v. NBCC (India) Ltd., which established that minority homebuyers cannot object to a resolution plan approved by a majority of the creditors. The Tribunal reiterated that the resolution plan had received 83.46% approval from the Committee of Creditors, thus dismissing the appeal and confirming the NCLT's order. The court emphasized the importance of majority voting in the resolution process to prevent liquidation and ensure the efficacy of the IBC. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, along with related interim applications.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Resolution Plan Approval - Minority Homebuyers' Objections - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 30(2) - The court held that a minority of homebuyers, represented by an Authorized Representative, cannot object to the resolution plan approved by a majority vote of the Committee of Creditors. The decision is binding on all members of the class, and allowing individual challenges would undermine the resolution process (Paras 5-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether minority homebuyers can challenge the approved resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was dismissed, affirming the NCLT's order that minority homebuyers lack locus standi to challenge the resolution plan approved by a majority vote.

Law Points

  • IBC compliance
  • resolution plan approval
  • minority objections
  • authorized representative voting
  • homebuyer rights
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (10) 4

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 749 of 2026

2026-10-14

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Barun Mitra, Ajai Das Mehrotra

Adv. Shyam Arora, Adv. Sonam Awasthi, Mr. Abhishek Anand, Mr. Karan Kohli, Ms. Palak Kalra

Ankit Wadhawa & Ors.

Ashish Singh Resolution Professional & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against NCLT order dismissing application under IBC.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to challenge discriminatory treatment in the resolution plan.

Filing Reason

To obtain equal treatment as homebuyers in the resolution plan.

Previous Decisions

NCLT dismissed the application citing minority status and Supreme Court precedent.

Issues

Can minority homebuyers challenge an approved resolution plan under IBC? What is the effect of majority voting on the rights of minority creditors?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued for equal treatment in the resolution plan. Respondents contended that minority objections are not valid under the established legal precedent.

Ratio Decidendi

Minority homebuyers cannot challenge a resolution plan approved by a majority of creditors, as established by the Supreme Court, ensuring the integrity of the resolution process under the IBC.

Judgment Excerpts

This application has been filed by a group of 11 home buyers constituting a minor percentage of the class of home buyers raising objections to the Resolution Plan. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jaypee Kensington Boulevard Apartments Welfare Association and Ors. vs. NBCC (India) Ltd. & Ors. has clearly laid down that one single homebuyer cannot be allowed to challenge the approved Resolution Plan.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the NCLT's order dated 12.02.2026, which dismissed the application under Section 60(5) of the IBC.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 30(2), Section 60(5)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals NCLAT Dismisses Appeal for Expedited Hearing on RP Replacement Application. The Tribunal directed the NCLT to hear the application for the replacement of the Resolution Professional and dispose of it expeditiously.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitration Award in Cooperative Bank Dispute — No Interference Under Article 227 as Concurrent Findings of Fact and Law Are Not Perverse. The Court upheld the recovery certificate issued under ...