High Court of Karnataka Issues Mandamus Against Police Investigation in Inter-State Business Case. The court found that the Maharashtra police lacked jurisdiction to investigate the petitioners' business activities in Karnataka without local police consent.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from two writ petitions filed by partnership firms engaged in the trading of pan masala and chewing tobacco, seeking protection against harassment by the Vadgaon Police Station in Maharashtra. The petitioners contended that they were being investigated under Crime No. 446/2025 for alleged violations of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, despite not being named in the FIR. The police had intercepted a truck transporting their products and subsequently issued notices requiring the petitioners to appear for questioning. The petitioners argued that the Maharashtra police lacked jurisdiction to investigate matters occurring in Karnataka without the local police's consent. The court analyzed the legal framework governing police jurisdiction, referencing constitutional provisions and relevant case law. It concluded that the Vadgaon Police acted beyond their authority, as they did not follow the required procedures for inter-state investigations. The court issued a mandamus directing the Maharashtra police to refrain from interfering with the petitioners' lawful business activities in Karnataka without proper jurisdictional authority.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Jurisdiction of Police - Territorial Limits of Police Authority - Constitution of India, Articles 226, 227 - The court held that police from one state cannot exercise jurisdiction in another state without consent, emphasizing the need for local police involvement in investigations. The actions of the Vadgaon Police were deemed ultra vires as they lacked territorial jurisdiction over the petitioners' business in Karnataka (Paras 13.3-13.21).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Vadgaon Police Station, Maharashtra, had the jurisdiction to investigate and issue notices to the petitioners operating in Karnataka.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court held that the Vadgaon Police Station lacked jurisdiction to investigate the petitioners' business activities in Karnataka and issued a mandamus directing them to refrain from such actions without proper authority.

Law Points

  • jurisdiction
  • police powers
  • investigation procedures
  • territorial limits
  • Food Safety and Standards Act
  • 2006
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • 2023
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (KAR) (10) 83

WP No. 31910 of 2025, WP No. 31320 of 2025

2026-10-29

Mr. Justice Suraj Govindaraj

Sri. Gautam S. Bharadwaj, Sri. Goudar Prashanth Fakkeragouda, Sri Mohammad Jaffer Shah, Sri. Panini A.H.

Shiva Enterprises, Siddhi Agencies

State of Maharashtra, Vadgaon Police Station, State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging police investigation and harassment.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to prevent harassment and interference with their business.

Filing Reason

Petitioners claimed unlawful investigation by Maharashtra police without jurisdiction.

Issues

Whether the Vadgaon Police Station had jurisdiction to investigate the petitioners in Karnataka. Whether the notices issued by the Maharashtra police were valid under the law.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that the Maharashtra police lacked territorial jurisdiction to investigate in Karnataka. The petitioners contended that the notices issued were ultra vires and without authority of law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized that police from one state cannot exercise jurisdiction in another state without consent, and any investigative actions taken without local police involvement are ultra vires.

Judgment Excerpts

The court held that police from one state cannot exercise jurisdiction in another state without consent. The actions of the Vadgaon Police were deemed ultra vires as they lacked territorial jurisdiction over the petitioners' business in Karnataka.

Procedural History

The writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking relief against police harassment and interference with business operations.

Acts & Sections

  • Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006: Sections 59, 30(2)(a), 27(3)(d), 27(3)(e), 26(2)(iv), 26(2)(i)
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: Sections 275, 274, 223, 123
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 160
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Section 179
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Incomplete Chargesheet and Non-Compliance with Section 36-A(4) of NDPS Act. Court held that filing of chargesheet without FSL Report and without proper extension under Section 36-A(4) rende...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Employment Rights of Displaced Abkari Workers — Rehabilitation Policy Reaffirmed. The court found that the modification of the rehabilitation policy was justified by public interest and did not violate the rights of the displa...