High Court Quashes Order Denying Input Tax Credit in GST Case Due to Technical Grounds. Denial of Input Credit on Technical Grounds Held Unjustified as Eligibility Was Not in Dispute Under Section 140(1) and 140(5) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, a public limited company engaged in the manufacture of Ethyl Acetate, sought to quash an order dated 24/02/2022 issued by the Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals) denying input tax credit of Rs. 6,29,02,146/- under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner had transitioned this credit from the erstwhile CENVAT regime to GST by filing a TRAN-1 form, which was accepted. However, a show-cause notice was issued alleging wrongful transition of credit, leading to the impugned order. The petitioner contended that the eligibility of the credit was never in dispute, and the denial was based on an inadvertent error in the form. The court noted that the Revenue's argument was that the credit was taken under the wrong section of the Act. The court emphasized that the right to input credit is an indefeasible right and cannot be denied on technical grounds. Citing precedents, the court found that the denial of credit was unjustified as the petitioner was otherwise eligible. Ultimately, the court allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned order and directing that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner regarding the credit during the pendency of the case.

Headnote

A) Taxation - Input Tax Credit - Denial on Technical Grounds - Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, Sections 140(1), 140(5) - The court held that the petitioner was entitled to input tax credit as there was no dispute regarding eligibility, and denial based on technical grounds was unjustified. The impugned order was quashed as it lacked jurisdiction. (Paras 19-21)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the denial of input tax credit based on technical grounds was justified.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ Petition No. 5508 of 2024 is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (e) which includes quashing the impugned order dated 24/02/2022 and directing that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner regarding the credit during the pendency of the case.

Law Points

  • input tax credit
  • transitional credit
  • GST
  • CENVAT credit
  • jurisdictional authority
  • technical grounds
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (10) 145

WP-5508-2024

2026-10-30

Sande sh D. Patil, M. S. Karnik

Mr. Bharat Raichandani, Mr. Mahesh Raichandani, Mr. Bhagrati Sahu, Ms. Juimala Ostwal, Ms. Sangeeta Yadav, Ms. Shruti D. Vyas, Mr. Aditya R. Deolekar

Laxmi Organic Industries Ltd.

Union of India, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, State of Maharashtra, Goods and Service Tax Council, Asst./Dy. Commissioner of Central Excise, Addl.Commissioner, C.G.S.T, Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the denial of input tax credit.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to quash the impugned order and prevent coercive recovery actions.

Filing Reason

Allegation of wrongful transition of credit under GST.

Previous Decisions

The eligibility of the credit was not disputed in prior proceedings.

Issues

Whether the denial of input tax credit was justified on technical grounds? Whether the petitioner was entitled to transitional credit under the CGST Act?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that eligibility of credit was never in dispute and denial was based on technical grounds. Respondent supported the order denying credit based on alleged incorrect transition.

Ratio Decidendi

The right to input tax credit is an indefeasible right that cannot be denied on technical grounds when eligibility is not in dispute.

Judgment Excerpts

The eligibility of CENVAT credit / input tax credit was never under dispute. The right to input credit is an indefeasible right.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals) which denied input tax credit based on a show-cause notice issued by the Asst./Dy. Commissioner of Central Excise.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017: 140(1), 140(5)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Modifies Share Entitlement in Partition Suit — Clarifies Joint Family Property Rights. The court determined that the business was separate and the Will executed by the father was valid, impacting the share distribution among heirs.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Addresses Starvation Deaths in Orissa — Directs Government to Implement Welfare Measures. The Court mandated the inclusion of social workers in relief committees to oversee welfare measures in Kalahandi and Koraput districts.