NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Dismisses Appeal Against Adjudicating Authority's Order. Appeal Dismissed as No Merit Found in Claims of Improper Service and Allegations Under Section 65 of IBC.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed against an order dated 10.04.2026 passed in I.A. No.289 of 2017 by the Adjudicating Authority, which dismissed the application concerning an ex-parte order dated 12.04.2017 admitting an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The Appellant contended that the application was dismissed without considering various averments and that he was not served properly, thus not given an opportunity to present his case. The Adjudicating Authority had held that notice was issued and deemed the Appellant validly served. The Appellant's counsel argued that he had made pleadings under Section 65 of the IBC, but the Tribunal noted that the allegations did not pertain to Section 65. The Respondent's counsel pointed out that there was a pending application for liquidation from 2020, which had not been decided for over five years. The Appellant claimed he was not responsible for the delay in the liquidation application. The Tribunal concluded that there was no reason to entertain the appeal and clarified that the Appellant could file an application under Section 65 during the pendency of the proceedings. The appeal was ultimately dismissed without expressing any opinion on the merits of the allegations from either party.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Section 9 Application - Dismissal of Application - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 9 - The Adjudicating Authority dismissed the application on grounds of valid service of notice, which the Appellant contested. The Tribunal found no merit in the appeal and upheld the dismissal, allowing for future applications under Section 65 during ongoing proceedings. Held that the appeal was dismissed (Paras 2-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal against the dismissal of the application under Section 9 of the IBC should be entertained.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding no merit in the Appellant's claims regarding improper service and the allegations under Section 65 of the IBC. The Tribunal clarified that the Appellant could file an application under Section 65 during the ongoing proceedings.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • Section 9 application
  • ex-parte order
  • Section 65 of IBC
  • service of notice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 173

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 923 of 2026

2026-05-26

Justice Ashok Bhushan, Barun Mitra

Mr. Malak Bhatt, Ms. Chhavi Tokas, Mr. Shreyansh Chpra, Mr. Divol Dighe, Mr. Siddharth Nath, Mr. Anunay Chowdhary, Mr. Asjad Hussain, Mr. Ishan Roy Chowdhury, Ms. Muskan Khatana

Rohit P. Chhabra & Anr.

Sanjay Kumar Ruia & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the dismissal of an application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Remedy Sought

The Appellant sought to overturn the dismissal of their application.

Filing Reason

The Appellant claimed improper service and lack of opportunity to present their case.

Previous Decisions

The Adjudicating Authority had previously dismissed the application citing valid service of notice.

Issues

Whether the appeal against the dismissal of the application under Section 9 should be entertained. Whether the Appellant was validly served and given an opportunity to present their case.

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued that the application was dismissed without considering various averments and that he was not served properly. The Respondent contended that the notice was validly served and highlighted the pending liquidation application.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the application under Section 9 due to valid service of notice and allowed for future applications under Section 65 during ongoing proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

The Adjudicating Authority by the impugned order has dismissed the application. The said application was dismissed by the Adjudicating Authority holding that notice was issued, the Appellant will be deemed to be validly served. We see no reason to entertain this appeal.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the order dated 10.04.2026 in I.A. No.289 of 2017, which dismissed the application concerning an ex-parte order dated 12.04.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Section 9, Section 65
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Converts Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide in Single Blow Case — Lack of Intention to Kill Established. The court held that a single knife blow during a sudden quarrel without premeditation falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Conditional Order Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Eviction Suit. Court upholds condition of depositing arrears of rent as a valid exercise of discretion under Order IX Rule 13 of CPC.