National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal as Infructuous and Directs Hearing for Interim Arrangement. The Tribunal directed the parties to appear before the adjudicating authority for consideration of interim arrangements in the liquidation estate under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal dealt with two appeals, Comp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 872 and 873 of 2026, filed against orders of the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench. The first appeal challenged an order dated 13.04.2026 regarding the interim arrangement for distribution of amounts in the liquidation estate, while the second appeal was against an order dated 09.04.2026 that directed a hearing for another application. The appellant, UTI Multi Opportunities Fund I, contended that the adjudicating authority's decision to delay the distribution of amounts was affecting creditors' rights. The respondent, CFM Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd., did not object to the preponement of hearing dates. The Tribunal found the second appeal infructuous and directed the parties to appear before the adjudicating authority on 03.06.2026 for a hearing on the pending applications, emphasizing that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The first appeal was disposed of, and the second was dismissed as infructuous.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Interim Arrangements - Distribution of Liquidation Estate - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 60(5) - The court considered the need for interim arrangements for distribution of amounts in the liquidation estate pending the resolution of various applications. It directed the parties to appear before the adjudicating authority for a hearing on the applications and for consideration of interim arrangements. Held that the adjudicating authority may fix a date for hearing in June (Paras 10-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeals against the orders of the adjudicating authority should be upheld or dismissed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 873/2026 was dismissed as infructuous, and Comp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 872/2026 was disposed of with directions for a hearing on 03.06.2026.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • interim arrangements
  • creditor claims
  • adjudicating authority orders
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 172

Comp. App. (AT) (Insolvency) No. 872 & 873 of 2026

2026-05-26

Justice Ashok Bhushan, Barun Mitra

Mr. Krishnendu Dutta, Mr. Himanshu Satija, Mr. Tejas, Ms. Ripul Swati, Mr. Anshul Rao, Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, Mr. Kaustubh Prakash, Ms. Hita Sharma, Mr. Ashraf Belal, Mr. Anish Agarwal, Mr. Pratik Chakma, Mr. Abhinav Maurya, Ms. Natasha Bagga

UTI Multi Opportunities Fund I

CFM Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals against orders of the National Company Law Tribunal regarding interim arrangements in insolvency proceedings.

Remedy Sought

UTI Multi Opportunities Fund I sought interim arrangements for distribution of amounts in the liquidation estate.

Filing Reason

The appeals were filed against orders that delayed the distribution of amounts to creditors.

Previous Decisions

The adjudicating authority had previously ordered hearings for various applications related to the claims.

Issues

Whether the appeals should be upheld or dismissed Whether interim arrangements for distribution should be made

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued for immediate interim arrangements due to pending applications. The respondent agreed to the preponement of hearing dates.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the need for timely hearings in insolvency proceedings to ensure creditors receive their due amounts, while also clarifying that it did not express any opinion on the merits of the case.

Judgment Excerpts

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No.873/2026 has become infructuous and no order is needed in the said appeal. We are of the view that both the parties to appear before the adjudicating authority on 03.06.2026.

Procedural History

The appeals were filed against orders of the National Company Law Tribunal dated 13.04.2026 and 09.04.2026, with subsequent hearings scheduled for 13.05.2026 and 20.07.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 60(5)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices and Order in Cenvat Credit Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Recovery of Central Excise Duty for Periods 2007-2008 Barred by Limitation as Notices Issued After Unreasonable Delay of Over 13 Years.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order for Perjury Proceedings in Matrimonial Case — Allegations of False Statements in Anticipatory Bail Application Not Deliberate Falsehood on Matter of Substance. The Court held that initiation of perjury proc...