NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Dismisses Appeals in Liquidation Proceedings — Ownership of Cotton Bales Excluded from Liquidation Estate. The liquidator's decision to exclude the cotton bales from the liquidation estate was upheld, and the appellants were advised to seek remedies in appropriate legal fora.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeals arose from a common order passed by the Adjudicating Authority concerning the liquidation of Galaxy Cotton and Textiles Pvt. Ltd. The appellants, Giriraj Enterprise and Nilesh Enterprise, claimed ownership of 4,100 bales of cotton stored in the warehouse of Galaxy Cotton, which was under liquidation. The cotton bales were hypothecated to Bank of Baroda, while the warehouse was mortgaged to State Bank of India (SBI). The appellants sought to exclude their cotton bales from the liquidation estate, asserting their ownership. The Adjudicating Authority had previously directed the liquidator to clarify the ownership of the cotton bales, which were ultimately excluded from the liquidation estate. During the pendency of the appeals, SBI attempted to auction the cotton bales, leading to further disputes. The court noted that the liquidator had already excluded the cotton bales from the liquidation assets and that SBI had not objected to this exclusion. The court emphasized that the appellants should seek remedies in the appropriate legal fora regarding their claims. Ultimately, the appeals were dismissed as the issues had been resolved by the liquidator, and the appellants were directed to pursue their claims elsewhere.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Liquidation Assets - Exclusion of Cotton Bales - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 36(4) - The liquidator excluded the cotton bales from the liquidation estate, and SBI did not object to this exclusion. The appeals were dismissed as the issue sought to be resolved had already been favorably considered by the liquidator. Held that the appellants should pursue their remedy in appropriate legal fora (Paras 12-19).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the cotton bales in question should be excluded from the liquidation asset of Galaxy Cotton.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both appeals were dismissed as the issue of exclusion of cotton bales from the liquidation estate had already been resolved by the liquidator. The appellants were directed to pursue their claims in appropriate legal fora.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • Liquidation assets
  • Security interests
  • Hypothecation rights
  • Jurisdiction of NCLAT
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 170

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No.2036 of 2024 and Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No.2037 of 2024

2026-05-27

Justice N. Seshasayee, Arun Baroka, Indevar Pandey

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Mr. Bhaskar Sharma, Mr. Ankur Mittal, Mr. Ankush Kumar, Mr. Nitesh Shrivastava

Giriraj Enterprise, Nilesh Enterprise

Mr. Rameshkumar Totla, Bank of Baroda, State Bank of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals against the order of the Adjudicating Authority regarding the exclusion of cotton bales from liquidation assets.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to exclude their cotton bales from the liquidation estate of Galaxy Cotton.

Filing Reason

Dispute over ownership and treatment of cotton bales during the liquidation process.

Previous Decisions

The liquidator had already excluded the cotton bales from the liquidation estate.

Issues

Whether the cotton bales should be excluded from the liquidation estate Jurisdiction of NCLAT to adjudicate on the title of the cotton bales

Submissions/Arguments

SBI contended that the dispute over cotton bales was already pending before DRAT Appellants argued that the cotton bales were their exclusive property and should not be part of the liquidation estate

Ratio Decidendi

The liquidator's decision to exclude the cotton bales from the liquidation estate was upheld, and the appellants were advised to seek remedies in appropriate legal fora regarding their claims.

Judgment Excerpts

The liquidator excluded the cotton bales from the liquidation estate, and SBI did not object to this exclusion. The appellants should pursue their remedy in appropriate legal fora.

Procedural History

The appeals arose from the common order of the Adjudicating Authority dated 23.08.2024, which was challenged by the appellants seeking exclusion of their cotton bales from the liquidation estate.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 36(4)
  • SARFAESI Act, 2002:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Tenants' Appeal in Lease Violation Case — Upholds Eviction Orders. The court confirmed that tenants' commercial use of premises violated lease terms, justifying eviction under Section 14(1)(k) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Housing Society Eviction Case — Licensee's Rights Affirmed. The court ruled that the appellant, as a licensee with a subsisting license on 1.2.1973, became a deemed tenant under the Rent Control Act, thus preventing e...