National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Case Due to Lack of Standing. Appellant's Claim as Prospective Buyer Not Recognized at This Stage of Resolution Process.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by Anuj Goyal against an order dated 22/05/2026 in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of Sarv Awas Housing Bhiwadi Private Limited. The resolution plan had been approved by the Committee of Creditors on 24/11/2024. The appellant claimed to have a prospective buyer agreement dated 07/11/2025 with an existing homebuyer and sought various reliefs, including substitution in the list of homebuyers and inclusion as a financial creditor. The Resolution Professional argued that the plan approval application had already been reserved for orders and that the appellant's claim was based on a prospective buyer agreement. The tribunal noted that any order passed by the Adjudicating Authority would be binding on the homebuyer from whom the appellant claimed the agreement. The tribunal concluded that there was no occasion to permit the appellant to intervene at this stage and that the appellant could approach the SRA after the plan approval. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Intervention in Resolution Process - Rights of Prospective Buyers - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - The appellant sought to intervene in the resolution process claiming rights as a prospective buyer based on an agreement with an existing homebuyer. The tribunal held that intervention was not appropriate at this stage and that the appellant could approach the SRA after the resolution plan approval. Held that the order of the Adjudicating Authority would be binding on the homebuyer (Paras 4-9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant could intervene in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process as a prospective buyer.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The tribunal dismissed the appeal, stating that there was no occasion to permit the appellant to intervene at this stage and that the appellant could approach the SRA after the resolution plan approval.

Law Points

  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
  • Resolution Plan Approval
  • Prospective Buyer Agreement
  • Committee of Creditors
  • Financial Creditors Rights
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 168

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1022 of 2026

2026-05-29

Justice Ashok Bhushan, Indevar Pandey

Mr. Sandeep Bajaj, Mr. Shashwat Anand, Mr. Mayank Biyani, Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, Mr. Karan Malhot, Mr. Anand Shankar Tripathi, Mr. Anant Sharma, Mr. Atul Sood, Mr. Rohan Sood

Anuj Goyal

Parminder Singh Bhullar & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the rejection of an application in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to be included as a financial creditor and to substitute another name in the resolution process.

Filing Reason

The appellant claimed rights based on a prospective buyer agreement with an existing homebuyer.

Previous Decisions

The resolution plan had been approved by the Committee of Creditors.

Issues

Whether the appellant could intervene in the resolution process as a prospective buyer.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant claimed rights based on a prospective buyer agreement. The Resolution Professional argued that the plan approval application was already reserved for orders.

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal held that intervention by the appellant was not appropriate at the current stage of the resolution process, emphasizing that the order of the Adjudicating Authority would be binding on the homebuyer.

Judgment Excerpts

This Appeal has been filed against the order dated 22/05/2026 We thus are of the view that at this stage there was no occasion to permit the Applicant to intervene in the matter. With these observations we dismiss the Appeal.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against an order rejecting the appellant's application in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, following the approval of the resolution plan by the Committee of Creditors.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Affirms Setting Aside of Auction Sale for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Under SARFAESI Act — Orders Refund with 12% Compound Interest. The Bank's failure to issue mandatory 30-day notice under Rules 8(6) and 8(7) of Security In...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Assessee in Sales Tax Exemption Case — Remits for Fresh Consideration. The Supreme Court found that the High Court failed to properly interpret the Exemption Notifications and directed the AO to reassess the exemption claims ba...