National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Extension of CIRP Period for Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal found it necessary to extend the CIRP period to complete the voting on resolution plans under Section 12 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the Resolution Professional of New Bombay Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. against an order rejecting an application for an extension of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) period. The application sought to extend the CIRP period by 90 days beyond the initial 330 days, which was set to expire on 27/02/2026. The Adjudicating Authority had rejected this application. The Resolution Professional argued that three resolution plans had been received and voting had commenced on 12/05/2026, but the order impugned was uploaded on 19/05/2026, leading to the abandonment of the voting process. The Committee of Creditors supported the need for a short extension to complete the voting process, as the corporate debtor was likely to be resolved. The Tribunal, considering the facts, decided to extend the CIRP period until 30/06/2026, allowing time for the voting to be completed and for any approved plan to be filed with the Adjudicating Authority. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - Extension of Period - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 12 - The court found that extending the period of CIRP was necessary to complete the voting on resolution plans that had been received. The appeal was allowed to extend the period until 30/06/2026 to ensure the process could be completed and any approved plan could be filed before the Adjudicating Authority. Held that justice would be served by this extension (Paras 6-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the period of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process should be extended to complete the voting on resolution plans.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal allowed the appeal and extended the period of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process until 30/06/2026 to complete the voting on resolution plans.

Law Points

  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
  • extension of period
  • voting on resolution plans
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 166

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 978 of 2026

2026-05-27

Justice Ashok Bhushan, Barun Mitra

Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Aishwarya Modi, Mr. Ishan Roy Chowdhury, Ms. Muskan Khatana, Mr. Anupam Singh

Shashank Dinesh Posture

Committee of Creditors of New Bombay Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the rejection of an application for extension of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process period.

Remedy Sought

Extension of the CIRP period by 90 days.

Filing Reason

To allow completion of voting on resolution plans.

Previous Decisions

The Adjudicating Authority rejected the application for extension.

Issues

Whether the period of CIRP should be extended to complete the voting on resolution plans.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued for an extension to complete the voting process. The Committee of Creditors supported the need for a short extension.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of extending the CIRP period to ensure the completion of the voting process on resolution plans, thereby serving the ends of justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The Resolution Professional has filed an Application for extension of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process period for 90 days beyond 330 days. We are of the view that, in the facts of the present case, ends of justice be served in extending the period of CIRP till 30/06/2026.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the order dated 06/05/2026 rejecting the application for extension of the CIRP period.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Section 12
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Condones Delay in Filing Appeals with Costs Imposed. The court emphasized the need for accountability in bureaucratic processes and the protection of public interest.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Tribal Chieftains in Land Acquisition Case Under Assam Lushai Hills District (Acquisition of Chief's Rights) Act, 1954. The petition was barred by delay and laches, and the acquisition of chiefs' lands with co...