National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Pre-existing Dispute. Existence of Genuine Dispute Established by Corporate Debtor, Leading to Dismissal of Section 9 Application Under Section 9(5)(ii)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arose from an order of the National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata, which dismissed a Section 9 application filed by the Appellant, M/s Airtech Airconditioners, seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Respondent, Kamladityya Construction Private Limited. The Appellant claimed an operational debt of Rs. 2,53,04,702.00 for services rendered under four contracts awarded in 2018. Despite executing the works and raising invoices, the Respondent denied liability, citing quality issues and pre-existing disputes. The Appellant issued a Demand Notice under Section 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code on 21.10.2022, which the Respondent replied to on 03.11.2022, denying the debt and raising disputes. The Adjudicating Authority dismissed the Section 9 application, citing the existence of a pre-existing dispute as per Section 9(5)(ii)(d) of the IBC. The Appellant contended that the dismissal was erroneous as the disputes were raised only after the Demand Notice. The Respondent argued that the disputes were genuine and communicated prior to the Demand Notice. The Tribunal found that the Respondent had indeed raised disputes before the Demand Notice, and the Adjudicating Authority's reliance on these disputes was justified. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court's decision and allowing the Appellant to seek other remedies under different laws.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Operational Debt - Existence of Dispute - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 9 - The Adjudicating Authority dismissed the Section 9 application due to the existence of a pre-existing dispute as communicated by the Corporate Debtor prior to the Demand Notice. The court held that the disputes raised were genuine and required further adjudication, thus affirming the dismissal of the application (Paras 7-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Adjudicating Authority erred in dismissing the Section 9 application on grounds of pre-existing dispute.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was dismissed without costs, affirming the Adjudicating Authority's decision to reject the Section 9 application due to the existence of a pre-existing dispute.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • operational debt
  • pre-existing dispute
  • Demand Notice
  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 151

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1295 of 2025

2026-05-06

Justice Ashok Bhushan, Barun Mitra

Mr. Vipul Ganda, Ms. Nitu Barik, Mr. Gyanesh Tiwary, Mr. Ketan Madan, Mr. Puneet Kumar, Mr. Utkarsh Singh

M/s Airtech Airconditioners

Kamladityya Construction Private Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of Section 9 application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Respondent.

Filing Reason

Respondent denied liability for operational debt and raised disputes.

Previous Decisions

Adjudicating Authority dismissed the Section 9 application citing pre-existing disputes.

Issues

Whether the Adjudicating Authority erred in dismissing the Section 9 application on grounds of pre-existing dispute.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that disputes were raised only after the Demand Notice and were not genuine. Respondent contended that disputes were communicated prior to the Demand Notice and were valid.

Ratio Decidendi

The existence of a genuine dispute precludes the initiation of insolvency proceedings under Section 9 of the IBC.

Judgment Excerpts

The Adjudicating Authority dismissed the Section 9 application due to the existence of a pre-existing dispute. The disputes raised were genuine and required further adjudication.

Procedural History

The Appellant filed a Section 9 application on 09.09.2023, which was dismissed by the Adjudicating Authority on 11.06.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 8, Section 9, Section 10A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Depreciation Case Under Merged States Removal of Difficulties Order. Retrospective Explanation in 1962 Amendment Deemed Notional Depreciation During Exemption Period as Actually Allowed, Reversing Hig...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Non-Tribal Purchaser's Challenge to Vesting of Land Under Section 5A of Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974. Earlier Dropping of Proceedings Under Section 3 Does Not Bar Subsequent Deemed Acquisi...