National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal in Competition Law Matter Due to Operational Challenges. Appellant's Withdrawal Granted as No Objection from Respondents, Leading to Dismissal.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose in the context of an appeal filed by Meru Travel Solutions Pvt Ltd against an order of the Competition Commission of India dated 20.06.2018, which disposed of information filed by the appellant on 02.06.2017 under Section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002. The appeal was admitted by the Tribunal on 22.07.2019. The appellant's counsel submitted that the company faced severe impacts on its operations and revenues, making it unviable to continue with the litigation. Consequently, the management decided to withdraw the appeal. The respondents' counsel indicated no objection to this application. The Tribunal, considering the circumstances, allowed the application for withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. The decision underscored the Tribunal's recognition of the appellant's operational challenges and the absence of opposition from the respondents, facilitating an unconditional withdrawal of the appeal.

Headnote

A) Competition Law - Withdrawal of Appeal - Unconditional Withdrawal - Competition Act, 2002, Section 26(2) - The appellant sought to withdraw the appeal due to severe operational and revenue impacts affecting its ability to continue litigation. The Tribunal allowed the application for withdrawal as there was no objection from the respondents, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn. Held that the appellant's request was justified under the circumstances (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant can withdraw the appeal unconditionally.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal allowed the application for withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of appeal
  • Section 26(2) Competition Act
  • 2002
  • Unconditional withdrawal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 123

IA NO.33 11 /2026 in Competition Appeal (AT) No.6 4 /2018

2026-05-12

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Mr. Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr Udayan Jain, Mr Abir Ray, Ms Kajal Sharma, Mr Vivek Pandey, Mr Ranjan Mishra, Mr Sasthibrata Panda, Mr Harsh J, Ms Biyanka Bhaba, Ms Nisha Kaur Uberoi, Mr Sarthak Pande, Ms Akrathi Shetty, Mr Rohan Bhargava, Mr Srihars h Peechera, Ms Shruti Aggarwala, Mr. Samar Bansal, Mr Rohan Arora, Mr Aman Singh Sethi, Mr Shivek Endlaw, Ms Saachi Keile

Meru Travel Solutions Pvt Ltd

Competition Commission of India & Ors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against an order of the Competition Commission of India.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to withdraw the appeal.

Filing Reason

The appeal arose from an order disposing of information filed under the Competition Act.

Previous Decisions

The appeal was admitted on 22.07.2019.

Issues

Whether the appellant can withdraw the appeal unconditionally.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant cited severe operational impacts as the reason for withdrawal. Respondents had no objection to the withdrawal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal recognized the appellant's operational challenges and permitted unconditional withdrawal of the appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

The application is allowed and the appellant is permitted to withdraw the present appeal unconditionally. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against an order of the Competition Commission of India, admitted on 22.07.2019, and the current application for withdrawal was moved on 12.05.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Competition Act, 2002: Section 26(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court Order on Disciplinary Dismissal — Upholds Employee's Rights. The court found that the dismissal order lacked proper justification and did not comply with the procedural requirements of the Railway P...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Penalties on Customs Broker for Importer's Misdeclaration — No Mens Rea or Knowledge of Fraud Established. Section 112(a), 112(b), 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 require active involvement or knowledge for penalty imposition ...