National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Partially Allows Appeal on Creditor Classification. The Tribunal recognized the appellant as a secured operational creditor for VAT dues while confirming the resolution plan for other claims.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arose from an order of the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai, which approved the Resolution Plan of Vinergy International Pvt. Ltd. under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Vapi, challenged the order, arguing that it was erroneously classified as an operational creditor instead of a secured creditor. The appellant had previously issued a notice creating a lien over the corporate debtor's bank account for outstanding tax dues prior to the commencement of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The appellant filed a claim for Rs. 15,65,92,673 towards VAT and CST dues, which was admitted in full. The appellant later requested to be treated as a secured creditor based on a Supreme Court ruling. The respondents contended that the appellant was estopped from challenging the classification as it did not raise objections during the approval process. The Tribunal analyzed the claim, noting that the statutory charge under the GVAT Act applied only to the VAT component. Ultimately, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, recognizing the appellant as a secured operational creditor for the VAT dues while confirming the resolution plan for the remaining claims.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Creditor Classification - Treatment of Appellant's Claim - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 53 - The appellant contended that it should be classified as a secured creditor due to statutory charge under the GVAT Act, while the Adjudicating Authority treated it as an operational creditor. The Tribunal held that the appellant is entitled to be treated as a secured operational creditor only for the VAT component of its claim, confirming the resolution plan for the remaining dues (Paras 12-13).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant's claim should be treated as a secured debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was partly allowed, recognizing the appellant as a secured operational creditor for the VAT component of Rs. 3,41,74,431 out of its claim, while confirming the resolution plan for the remaining dues.

Law Points

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • 2016
  • Secured Creditor
  • Operational Creditor
  • Statutory Charge
  • Gujarat Value Added Tax Act
  • 2003
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 112

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 108 of 2025

2026-05-11

Justice N. Seshasayee, Arun Baroka, Indevar Pandey

Mr. Priyam Raval, Ms. Sanjukta Roy, Mr. Abhishek Anand, Mr. Karan Kohli, Ms. Palak Kalia, Mr. Rajat Gupta, Ms. Ridhima Mehrotra

Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Vapi

M/s ARCK Resolution Professionals LLP, UV Stressed Assets Management Private Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the approval of a Resolution Plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to be classified as a secured creditor.

Filing Reason

The appellant filed the appeal challenging its classification as an operational creditor.

Previous Decisions

The Adjudicating Authority had approved the Resolution Plan treating the appellant as an operational creditor.

Issues

Classification of creditor status Entitlement to secured creditor status under the GVAT Act

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued for secured creditor status based on statutory charge. Respondents contended that the appellant was estopped from challenging the classification.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that the appellant is entitled to be treated as a secured operational creditor for the VAT component, while the remaining dues are to be handled as per the approved resolution plan.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeal arises out of the order dated 09.12.2024 passed by the Hon’ble National Company Law Tribunal. The appellant contended that it should be classified as a secured creditor due to statutory charge under the GVAT Act.

Procedural History

The appellant filed an appeal against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal approving the Resolution Plan, challenging the classification of its claim.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 7, Section 30(2), Section 53
  • Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003: Section 44, Section 48
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in IPC Case Due to Lack of Common Intention. Conviction Modified for Babu Ram and Deshraj from Murder to Causing Grievous Hurt under Section 325 IPC.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Modifies Gratuity Scheme to Relate to Basic Wage, Not Consolidated Wage. Departure from Normal Rule Requires Strong Evidence; Company's Sound Financial Position Not Sufficient to Justify Higher Gratuity on Total Wage Packet.