NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Modifies Cost Imposed in Company Appeal Due to Financial Health Consideration. Cost Reduced from Rs. 9 Lakhs to Rs. 2 Lakhs Based on Appellant's Compliance and Lack of Reasoning for Higher Cost.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved SL Contractors Private Limited and others as appellants against the Registrar of Companies and another respondent. The appeal was filed to challenge the cost imposed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in a previous order. The appellants had deposited Rs. 2 Lakhs with the Prime Minister Relief Fund as part of compliance with an earlier order. The appellants contended that the NCLT had previously imposed a cost of only Rs. 25,000 in a similar case without providing reasons for the disparity in costs. The Tribunal noted the financial health of the company and the absence of clear criteria for imposing costs in such cases. Consequently, the Tribunal modified the cost to Rs. 2 Lakhs, allowing the amount already deposited by the appellants. The appeal was allowed to this extent, and the pending interim applications were disposed of. The decision was made by Justice Yogesh Khanna and Mr. Ajai Das Mehrotra.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Modification of Costs - Appropriate Cost Imposition - Companies Act, 2013, Section 252(3) - The Tribunal modified the cost imposed by the NCLT from Rs. 9 Lakhs to Rs. 2 Lakhs, considering the financial health of the company and the lack of reasoning for the higher cost in the previous case. Held that the amount deposited by the appellant was appropriate under the circumstances (Paras 4-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the cost imposed by the NCLT should be modified based on the financial health of the company.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal modified the cost imposed by the NCLT from Rs. 9 Lakhs to Rs. 2 Lakhs, allowing the amount already deposited by the appellant. The appeal was allowed to this extent, and the pending interim applications were disposed of.

Law Points

  • Modification of costs
  • compliance with orders
  • discretion in imposing costs
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 96

Company Appeal (AT) No. 79 of 2026 & I.A. No. 1674 of 2026

2026-05-22

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Mr. Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. SP Singh Chawla, Mr. Harpreet Singh Malhotra, Mr. Kartik Sharma, Mr. Puneet Rai, Mr. Rishabh Nangia, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Mr. Nikhil Jain

SL Contractors Private Limited & Ors.

Registrar of Companies & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the imposition of costs by the NCLT.

Remedy Sought

Modification of the cost imposed by the NCLT.

Filing Reason

Challenging the disparity in costs imposed in similar cases.

Previous Decisions

NCLT had previously imposed a cost of Rs. 25,000 in a similar case.

Issues

Modification of costs imposed by NCLT Criteria for imposing costs in company matters

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued for reduction of costs based on financial health and lack of reasoning for higher costs. Respondent did not provide substantial counterarguments regarding the financial health of the appellant.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal exercised its discretion to modify the cost imposed by the NCLT based on the financial health of the company and the absence of clear reasoning for the higher cost.

Judgment Excerpts

This order be read in continuation to the order dated 03.03.2026. Considering the facts narrated before us viz. the financial health of the company involved...

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the order of the NCLT imposing costs, with prior compliance involving a deposit to the Prime Minister Relief Fund.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013: Section 252(3)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case — High Court's Acquittal Found Erroneous.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Corporation in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Under Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949. High Court's finding that Sections 212 and 216 lacked specification of principles and manner of compensation wa...