National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal Against NCLT Order on Waiver Application. The Tribunal found that the NCLT's decision to grant waiver was justified based on the prima facie case of oppression and mismanagement.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by The Asansol Club Limited against an order dated 04.02.2026 from the NCLT Kolkata Bench concerning a waiver application under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013. The appellant contended that the NCLT granted waiver to Respondent No. 1 without sufficient justification, arguing that the petition was filed by only 81 members instead of the required 150, and that Respondent No. 1 had been removed from membership due to various charges. The appellant referenced previous judgments to support their claim that waiver should only be granted under exceptional circumstances. The NCLT's order stated that the petition disclosed a prima facie case of systemic oppression and mismanagement affecting the club's affairs, which warranted judicial scrutiny. The appellant argued that many members withdrew their support for Respondent No. 1 due to intimidation, and that the NCLT failed to consider the lack of authority from these members. The respondent countered that he had been a long-standing member and that his termination was illegal. The Tribunal noted that the NCLT had considered the grounds for granting waiver and found them sufficient. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the NCLT's order as legally valid.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Waiver Application - Grounds for Granting Waiver - Companies Act, 2013, Section 244 - The Tribunal held that the NCLT's decision to grant waiver lacked cogent reasoning and did not adequately address the exceptional circumstances required for such a waiver, leading to potential injustice. The appeal was dismissed as the NCLT's order was found to be legally sound (Paras 1-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the NCLT erred in granting waiver to Respondent No. 1 without sufficient reasoning and in violation of the Companies Act, 2013.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was dismissed, affirming the NCLT's order allowing the waiver application under Section 244 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Tribunal directed the respondents to file their reply to the main Company Petition within two weeks and scheduled further hearing for 12.03.2026.

Law Points

  • waiver application
  • oppression and mismanagement
  • prima facie case
  • membership rights
  • Companies Act
  • 2013
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 77

Company Appeal (AT) No.85 of 2026

2026-05-05

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Mr. Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr Krishnendu Dutta, Sr Advocate, Mr. Vikram P, Mr Mukul Katyal, Ms Shruti Swarika, Ms Rashmi S, Ms Sarvapriya Mukherjee, Ms Alina Merin Mathew, Ms Niharika Sharma, Mr Joy Saha, Sr Advocate, Ms Manju Bhaturia, Sr Advocate, Mr Ashish Choudhury, Ms Tanvi Luhariawal, Mr Abhishek Arora, Mr Anand Kamal, Ms Shreya Choudhary, Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Ms Jeol

The Asansol Club Limited

Somnath Biswal & Ors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against NCLT order regarding waiver application in a company petition.

Remedy Sought

The Asansol Club Limited sought to overturn the NCLT's waiver decision.

Filing Reason

The NCLT granted waiver to Respondent No. 1 without sufficient justification.

Previous Decisions

The NCLT's order was based on a prima facie case of oppression and mismanagement.

Issues

Whether the NCLT erred in granting waiver without sufficient reasoning. Whether the membership requirements for filing the petition were met.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the NCLT granted waiver without sufficient justification and that Respondent No. 1's membership was restored despite removal. The respondent contended that he was a long-standing member and that the termination was illegal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal upheld the NCLT's decision to grant waiver based on the prima facie case of oppression and mismanagement, emphasizing the need for judicial scrutiny in such matters.

Judgment Excerpts

The present appeal is filed by the Appellant under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013 against an order dated 04.02.2026. The Petitioners have demonstrated that the impugned actions particularly the termination/suspension of membership... would completely shut the doors of judicial scrutiny. We consider it just and proper to allow the application under Section 244.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the NCLT's order allowing a waiver application in a company petition. The NCLT's order was challenged on grounds of insufficient reasoning and violation of membership requirements.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013: Section 421, Section 242, Section 244
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Applies Multiplier of 18 and Adds Future Prospects for Self-Employed Deceased. Claimants awarded Rs. 8,56,800/- with interest at 7.5% per annum under Section 166 of Motor Ve...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Formaldehyde Manufacturing Units to Operate Without Prior Environmental Clearance Where Consent to Establish and Operate Were Granted by Pollution Control Board. The Court Held That Units Cannot Be Closed for Want of Prior EC Whe...