NCLAT Restores Company Petition Following Delay in Filing Affidavit. The delay in filing the affidavit was deemed inadvertent, leading to the restoration of the company petition under Section 230(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal filed by Festivity Realtors Pvt. Ltd. against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) dated 11.11.2025, which dismissed a restoration application for a company petition due to non-compliance with procedural requirements. The NCLT had previously dismissed the company petition on 07.10.2025 for failure to file an affidavit disclosing any pending investigations or proceedings against the companies as required under Section 230(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013. The appellants contended that although the affidavit was prepared, it was not filed due to an oversight by their legal counsel. The NCLAT considered the circumstances surrounding the delay and noted that the affidavit had indicated no pending investigations against the companies. The tribunal allowed the restoration application, set aside the NCLT's dismissal order, and restored the company petition, imposing a cost of Rs. 50,000 to be deposited in the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, and any pending applications were also addressed.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Restoration of Company Petition - Delay in Filing Affidavit - Companies Act, 2013, Section 230(2)(a) - The NCLAT allowed the restoration application as the delay in filing the affidavit was due to inadvertent oversight and not negligence, thus restoring the company petition to its original number. The court emphasized the need for compliance with procedural requirements but recognized the circumstances leading to the delay (Paras 6-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in filing the affidavit warranted dismissal of the company petition.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The NCLAT allowed the restoration application, set aside the NCLT's dismissal order, and restored the company petition, imposing a cost of Rs. 50,000 to be deposited in the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund.

Law Points

  • Restoration of company petition
  • compliance with procedural requirements
  • affidavit submission
  • Companies Act
  • 2013
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 75

Company Appeal (AT) No. 80 of 2026 & I.A. No. 1678 of 2026

2026-05-06

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Mr. Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Ajay Garg, Mr. Kartikeya Goel

Festivity Realtors Pvt. Ltd.

Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of restoration application for company petition.

Remedy Sought

Restoration of company petition and setting aside of dismissal order.

Filing Reason

Non-compliance with affidavit submission requirements.

Previous Decisions

Company petition dismissed for failure to file required affidavit.

Issues

Whether the delay in filing the affidavit warranted dismissal of the company petition.

Submissions/Arguments

The delay was due to inadvertent oversight by legal counsel. Affidavit indicated no pending investigations against the companies.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that inadvertent delays in procedural compliance should not lead to dismissal of substantive claims, especially when no prejudice is caused to the other party.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeal is disposed of in terms of the above. Considering the facts, it was the second motion petition.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the NCLT's order dismissing the restoration application for non-compliance with affidavit requirements.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013: Section 230(2)(a)
  • Companies Act, 1956:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Extension of Term of Agricultural Produce Market Committee Members — State Government Exceeded Power Under Section 14(5) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 by Extending Ter...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction Under Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient to justify the conviction under Section 4 of the Act.