National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal of Bankrupt Seeking Travel Permission — Application Rejected Due to Expired Travel Period. The court found that the basis for the travel request had lapsed due to the expiration of the relevant purchase order.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by a bankrupt individual challenging the order of the Adjudicating Authority that rejected his application for permission to travel abroad. The personal insolvency proceedings against the Appellant were admitted on 29.04.2024, and he had various criminal proceedings pending against him. The Appellant sought permission to travel to the U.A.E. for business purposes based on a purchase order issued by a U.A.E. company, which was valid for 13 months plus an additional six months for a parallel run. The Adjudicating Authority had previously declared the Appellant bankrupt and restricted his travel abroad without permission. The Appellant argued that he had cooperated with the Bankruptcy Trustee and had previously traveled with permission from the Gujarat High Court. The Bankruptcy Trustee opposed the application, stating that the requested travel period had already elapsed and the purchase order's duration had expired. The court analyzed the purchase order and concluded that the travel request was based on an expired agreement. The court emphasized that the Appellant could file a new application for travel if new circumstances arose. Ultimately, the appeal was disposed of, allowing the Appellant to seek future permissions as necessary.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Travel Permission - Right to Travel Abroad - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section Not mentioned - The Appellant, despite being declared bankrupt, sought permission to travel abroad for business purposes. The court held that the basis for the travel request had lapsed due to the expiration of the relevant purchase order, thus rejecting the appeal. However, the court allowed the Appellant to file a fresh application if circumstances arose (Paras 15-16).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Appellant, declared bankrupt, could be permitted to travel abroad for business despite the rejection of his application by the Adjudicating Authority.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was dismissed as the basis for the travel request had lapsed due to the expiration of the purchase order. The court allowed the Appellant to file a fresh application for travel if circumstances arose.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • travel permission
  • bankruptcy trustee
  • purchase order interpretation
  • procedural propriety
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 73

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 349 of 2026

2026-05-04

Ashok Bhushan, Indevar Pandey

Krishnendu Dutta, Keith Varghese, Niharika Sharma, Ashish Verma, Nikhil Thakur

Sunil Surendrabhai Kakkad

Samir Ganeshbhai Marathe & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the rejection of travel permission by the Adjudicating Authority in bankruptcy proceedings.

Remedy Sought

The Appellant sought permission to travel abroad for business purposes.

Filing Reason

The Appellant was declared bankrupt and required permission to travel abroad for business opportunities.

Previous Decisions

The Adjudicating Authority had previously declared the Appellant bankrupt and restricted his travel without permission.

Issues

Interpretation of the purchase order regarding travel permission Rights of a bankrupt individual to travel abroad for business

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued for the right to travel for business despite bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy Trustee contended that the application was infructuous due to the expiration of the travel period.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the expiration of the purchase order negated the basis for the Appellant's travel request, emphasizing the need for a fresh application under new circumstances.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appellant has right to travel abroad to carry on his business. The duration of the Purchase Order is 13 months plus six months. The rejection of earlier application IA No.1178 of 2025 shall not come in the way of the Appellant.

Procedural History

The Appellant filed IA No.1178 of 2025 seeking permission to travel abroad, which was rejected by the Adjudicating Authority on 12.02.2026. The Appellant then filed this appeal challenging that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Upholds Developer's Rights in Commercial Property Dispute — Clarifies Interpretation of Lease Agreement.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Allows Writ Petition for Ex-Gratia Compensation to Legal Heirs of COVID-19 Deceased Government Employee. The court held that the cutoff date in Government Resolution dated 25.04.2022 applies to the date of contracting COVID-19, not the dat...