NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Upholds Appellant in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process — Interim Relief Granted for Payment Settlement. Cited case law established the procedure for withdrawal of CIRP under Section 12A.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed against an order from the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, which admitted a Section 7 application by the Financial Creditor against the Corporate Debtor. The Appellant contended that the Corporate Debtor had ongoing government contracts and was awaiting payments, which were delayed due to GST registration issues. The Appellant highlighted a letter from Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Ltd. regarding the need to activate GST for payment processing. The Respondent countered that cheques issued by the Corporate Debtor were dishonored and questioned the authenticity of the letter cited by the Appellant. The Appellant sought an opportunity to settle the dues outlined in the Section 7 application. The Tribunal allowed the Appellant to deposit the entire Part IV amount within 30 days in an interest-bearing fixed deposit with the Registrar of NCLAT, stating that if the amount was cleared within four weeks, the Appellant could file for further directions. The Tribunal also addressed an I.A. filed by the Appellant regarding a settlement with other unsecured creditors and noted the necessity for justice in resolving the appeal. The Tribunal permitted the Financial Creditor to file a Section 12A application for withdrawal of the CIRP, which would be decided according to the Supreme Court's ruling in a cited case. Until the Section 12A application was resolved, no further steps in the CIRP would be taken. The appeal was subsequently disposed of.

Headnote

A) Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - Section 7 Application - Admission of Application - Insolvency proceedings were initiated against the Corporate Debtor based on a Section 7 application filed by the Financial Creditor. The Tribunal allowed the Appellant to deposit the entire Part IV amount within 30 days to facilitate settlement of dues, emphasizing the need for justice in the proceedings. Held that the Appellant's request for opportunity to liquidate the amount was reasonable (Paras 4-4).

B) Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - Section 12A Application - Withdrawal of CIRP - The Tribunal directed that an application under Section 12A for withdrawal of the CIRP shall be filed by the Financial Creditor, which must be decided in accordance with the law as laid down by the Supreme Court. The Tribunal suspended further steps in the CIRP until the Section 12A application was resolved (Paras 8-9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Appellant should be allowed to deposit the entire Part IV amount and the implications of the Section 12A application.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal allowed the Appellant to deposit the entire Part IV amount within 30 days and permitted the Financial Creditor to file a Section 12A application for withdrawal of the CIRP, suspending further steps in the process until the application was resolved.

Law Points

  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
  • Section 7 Application
  • GST Registration
  • Interim Orders
  • Section 12A Application
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 64

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 406 of 2026

2026-05-07

Justice Ashok Bhushan, Barun Mitra

Mr. Biswajit Dubey, Mr. Anuj Tiwari, Ms. Shalini Basu, Mr. Sameer Mishra, Mr. Shivendra Nath Mishra, Mr. Asav Rajan, Ms. Kashish Chadha, Mr. Devang S, Mr. Aditya Shah, Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, Mr. Amit Ojha

Milind Devidas Thekedar

Insta Capital Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the admission of a Section 7 application in insolvency proceedings.

Remedy Sought

The Appellant sought to deposit the entire Part IV amount and requested an opportunity to settle dues.

Filing Reason

The appeal was filed against the order admitting the Section 7 application by the Financial Creditor.

Previous Decisions

The National Company Law Tribunal had admitted the Section 7 application on 18/02/2026.

Issues

Whether the Appellant should be allowed to deposit the entire Part IV amount. Implications of the Section 12A application for withdrawal of CIRP.

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued for the opportunity to liquidate the dues and highlighted GST registration issues. The Respondent contended that cheques issued were dishonored and questioned the authenticity of the Appellant's evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the importance of allowing the Appellant to settle dues and the procedural requirements for withdrawal of CIRP under Section 12A, ensuring compliance with judicial precedents.

Judgment Excerpts

This Appeal has been filed against the order dated 18/02/2026, by which order National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, has admitted Section 7 Application. In view of the facts of the present case, we are of the view that Appellant be allowed to deposit the entire Part IV amount within 30 days from today in an interest bearing FDR with the Registrar NCLAT.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the admission of a Section 7 application by the Financial Creditor, followed by interim orders allowing the Appellant to deposit dues and addressing the Section 12A application.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 7, Section 12A
  • Goods and Services Tax Act:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Allowing Withdrawal of Suit with Leave to File Fresh Suit. The High Court failed to properly assess the grounds for withdrawal under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, leading to an e...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Rash Driving Case Resulting in Death. Court Emphasizes Deterrent Sentencing for Professional Drivers to Curb Road Accidents.