National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Upholds Order Declaring Mortgage as Preferential Transaction. The Mortgage Deed executed shortly before insolvency proceedings was deemed preferential as it altered the creditor's status from unsecured to secured.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by Suraksha Realty Limited against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) which declared a mortgage executed in favor of the Appellant as a preferential transaction under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Corporate Debtor, Radius Estate Projects Private Limited, had entered into a Debenture Subscription Agreement in December 2014, providing for the creation of a security interest. However, the Corporate Debtor failed to perfect this security until the execution of the Mortgage Deed in July 2021, shortly before the initiation of insolvency proceedings. The Appellant argued that the mortgage merely formalized an existing security arrangement and should not be classified as preferential. The Respondent, the Resolution Professional, contended that the mortgage was executed to secure pre-existing liabilities and improved the Appellant's position as a creditor. The NCLT found that the mortgage transaction was not in the ordinary course of business and constituted a preferential transaction, leading to the appeal. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the NCLT's findings, emphasizing that the mortgage altered the Appellant's status within the look-back period and did not meet the criteria for ordinary business transactions.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Preferential Transactions - Definition and Criteria - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 43 - The court examined whether the Mortgage Deed constituted a preferential transaction under the Code, concluding that it did, as it altered the creditor's status from unsecured to secured within the look-back period. Held that the transaction did not fall within the ordinary course of business and was executed to secure antecedent debts (Paras 50-52).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the registered Deed of Mortgage dated 29.07.2021 executed by the Corporate Debtor in favour of the Appellant amounts to a 'preferential transaction' under Section 43 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the NCLT's order, declaring the mortgage as a preferential transaction and directing the release of the security interest created in favor of the Appellant.

Law Points

  • preferential transaction
  • insolvency proceedings
  • security interest
  • ordinary course of business
  • antecedent debt
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 52

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 1754 of 2025

2026-05-19

Indevar Pandey

Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Mr. Amir Arsiwala

Suraksha Realty Limited

Mr. Vithal M. Dahake (RP), Radius Estate Projects Private Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the NCLT's order declaring a mortgage as a preferential transaction.

Remedy Sought

Suraksha Realty Limited sought to overturn the NCLT's order.

Filing Reason

The NCLT classified the mortgage as a preferential transaction under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Previous Decisions

The NCLT found the mortgage executed within the look-back period and not in the ordinary course of business.

Issues

Whether the mortgage constituted a preferential transaction under Section 43 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code?

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued that the mortgage merely perfected an existing security arrangement and did not create a preferential benefit. The Respondent contended that the mortgage improved the Appellant's position as a creditor and was executed within the look-back period.

Ratio Decidendi

The mortgage executed shortly before the initiation of insolvency proceedings was deemed a preferential transaction as it altered the creditor's status from unsecured to secured within the look-back period, failing to meet the criteria for ordinary business transactions.

Judgment Excerpts

The court examined whether the Mortgage Deed constituted a preferential transaction under the Code, concluding that it did. The transaction did not fall within the ordinary course of business and was executed to secure antecedent debts. The Appellant argued that the Mortgage Deed merely perfected a pre-existing security which was already contemplated under the DSA.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the NCLT's order dated 10.10.2025, which allowed the Resolution Professional's application declaring the mortgage as a preferential transaction.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 43, Section 60(5)(c)
  • Companies Act, 2013: Section 186(5)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in IT Act and IPC Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Cheating or Identity Theft. Consensual Relationship Not Amounting to Cheating Under Section 420 IPC or Identity Theft Under Section 66(...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Sanction for Prosecution Under MCOCA — Validity of Sanction Order Affirmed.