National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Upholds Order Directing Contribution to Corporate Debtor's Assets. The court found sufficient evidence of fraudulent transactions justifying the order under Section 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by three appellants challenging an order from the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) which directed them to contribute a substantial amount to the assets of Gajanan Solvex Ltd., a corporate debtor undergoing insolvency proceedings. The NCLT's order stemmed from findings of fraudulent transactions involving the sale of shares in a subsidiary, Rio Resource PTE Ltd., and the subsequent diversion of funds. The insolvency resolution process was initiated on an application by the State Bank of India under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, leading to the appointment of a resolution professional. The resolution professional discovered that the corporate debtor had failed to disclose significant financial transactions and had misrepresented its financial position. The forensic audit revealed that the corporate debtor had sold its shares in Rio Resource without proper valuation and failed to bring the sale proceeds into the corporate debtor's accounts. The appellants argued that the transactions were legitimate and that the NCLT had overstepped its jurisdiction by ordering an investigation by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO). The court analyzed the evidence, including the forensic audit report, and concluded that the appellants had engaged in fraudulent trading, justifying the NCLT's order. The court emphasized the need for transparency and accountability in corporate governance, particularly during insolvency proceedings, and upheld the NCLT's directive for the appellants to contribute to the corporate debtor's assets.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Fraudulent Trading - Liability to Contribute - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 66 - The Adjudicating Authority directed the appellants to contribute to the assets of the corporate debtor based on findings of fraudulent transactions. The court held that the evidence presented indicated intent to defraud creditors, justifying the order for contribution (Paras 1-47).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellants were liable to contribute to the assets of the corporate debtor under Section 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court upheld the NCLT's order directing the appellants to contribute Rs. 9,04,61,725/- to the corporate debtor's assets, finding sufficient evidence of fraudulent trading and misrepresentation of financial transactions.

Law Points

  • Fraudulent trading
  • wrongful trading
  • corporate insolvency resolution process
  • contribution to assets
  • burden of proof
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 27

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 1044 of 2024

2026-05-20

Justice Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan

Mr. Anuj Tiwari, Ms. Shalini Basu, Mr. Vaibhav Vats, Mr. Sameer Mishra, Mr. Shivendra Nath Mishra, Mr. Abhishek Anand, Mr. Karan Kohli, Ms. Palak Kalra

Mr. Nitin Ramchandra Jadhav, Mr. Bhavrao Gore, Mr. Anmol Kamchandra Jadhav

Mr. Vijendra Kumar Jain, Mr. Ram Sethia

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal regarding contribution to corporate debtor's assets.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to overturn the order directing them to contribute funds to the corporate debtor.

Filing Reason

The order was based on findings of fraudulent transactions during the corporate insolvency resolution process.

Previous Decisions

The NCLT had previously directed the appellants to contribute a specified amount based on the forensic audit findings.

Issues

Whether the appellants engaged in fraudulent trading under Section 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Whether the NCLT had jurisdiction to direct an investigation by the SFIO.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the transactions were legitimate and not fraudulent. Respondent contended that the transactions were fraudulent and aimed at diverting assets from creditors.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the evidence of fraudulent trading justified the order for contribution under Section 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, emphasizing the need for accountability in corporate governance.

Judgment Excerpts

The Ld. Adjudicating Authority directed the appellants to contribute Rs. 9,04,61,725/- along with additional unquantified amount to the Corporate Debtor. The forensic auditor has reported in its report that in the audited balance sheet of the financial year 2021-2022 CD was having an investment in Rio Resource Singapore but suddenly on 06.01.2023 the CD claimed that this investment was sold on 31.12.2018. The entire transaction with respect to the Aero Steel is fake and false so as to take away the funds away from the CD to the detriment of its creditors.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the order of the NCLT dated 07.05.2024, which directed the appellants to contribute to the assets of the corporate debtor based on findings of fraudulent transactions.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 7, Section 66
  • Companies Act, 2013: Section 212
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Right to Bonus Under Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 — Clarifies Applicability Despite Authorised Controller Appointment.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Defendant in Undue Influence Case Concerning Gift Deed—Reverses High Court’s Presumption of Undue Influence Based on Relationship and Age. No Presumption of Undue Influence Arises Merely from Near Relationship or Advanced Ag...