National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Early Listing of Appeal in Insolvency Proceedings Due to Upcoming Vacation. Tribunal Directs Hearing on 08.07.2026, Acknowledging Scheduling Constraints.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal involved an application for early listing of Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 418 of 2026. The appellant, Power Trust, sought to expedite the hearing due to the approaching summer vacation, with a request for the appeal to be heard in the week commencing 25.05.2026. The Tribunal noted that the appeal was already scheduled for 08.07.2026 and determined that the hearing could not be completed on 29.05.2026, the last working day before the vacation. Both parties agreed to make submissions on the next date, and the Tribunal ordered that the appeal remain listed for the previously scheduled date. Additionally, the appearance of counsel for the SRA was to be recorded in a prior order. The Tribunal's decision emphasized the need for proper scheduling in light of the summer vacation and the necessity of recording counsel appearances.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Early Listing of Appeals - Request for Early Hearing - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - The appellant sought an early listing of the appeal for hearing due to the impending summer vacation. The Tribunal directed that the appeal be listed on 08.07.2026, considering the inability to complete the hearing before the vacation. Held that the appeal would be heard on the specified date (Paras 2-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether to allow early listing of Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 418 of 2026 for hearing.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal directed that the appeal be listed for hearing on 08.07.2026, acknowledging the scheduling constraints due to the summer vacation.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • early listing of appeals
  • recording of counsel appearances
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 22

I.A. No. 3973 of 2026 in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 418 of 2026

2026-05-27

Justice Ashok Bhushan, Barun Mitra

Mr. Pranjit Bhattacharya, Ms. Salonee Shukla, Ms. Shalini Singh, Ms. Srideepa Bhattacharyya, Mr. Aditya Pandey, Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Mr. Somesh Srivastava, Mr. Ramakant Rai, Ms. Drishthi Kaushik, Ms. Priyansha Sharma, Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Mr. Saurav Panda, Ms. Charu Bansal, Ms. Snigdha Saraff

Power Trust

Bhuvan Madan, Resolution Professional of Hiranmaye Energy Ltd. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for early listing of an insolvency appeal

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought early hearing of the appeal

Filing Reason

Due to the impending summer vacation

Previous Decisions

The appeal was already listed for hearing on 08.07.2026

Issues

Whether to allow early listing of the appeal Recording of counsel appearances

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant requested early listing due to summer vacation Both parties agreed to make submissions on the next date

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the importance of scheduling hearings appropriately in light of vacations and the necessity of recording counsel appearances.

Judgment Excerpts

Let the Appeal come on 08.07.2026 high on board as directed earlier. Both parties submit that they shall make submissions on the next date.

Procedural History

The application I.A. No. 3973 of 2026 was filed in the context of Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 418 of 2026, which was already listed for hearing.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition on Contributory Negligence in Motor Accident Case. The court upheld the liability of the motorcycle owner for compensation due to the minor's negligent driving.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in NDPS Act Case Due to Quantity Consideration. Court Clarifies that Actual Narcotic Content Determines Punishment Under Section 21.