NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Upholds Pending Application in Insolvency Proceedings — Court directs timely hearing. Citing delays in the hearing of the Section 12A application, the tribunal emphasized the importance of expediting the process under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter involved an application filed by Sasmita Rani Samanta in the context of Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 519 of 2026, which was previously disposed of by an order on 18/03/2026. The court noted that the application under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, had been listed on four occasions but remained pending. Counsel for the IRP indicated that further claims had been received, while HDFC Bank's counsel mentioned plans to file an intervention application in the 12A proceedings. The court refrained from making any observations or issuing directions regarding the appeal, emphasizing the need for the Adjudicating Authority to hear the 12A application promptly, with the next date set for 24/06/2026. The application was disposed of with the directive for timely hearing.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Section 12A Application - Timely Hearing - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 12A - The court directed the Adjudicating Authority to endeavor to hear the pending Section 12A application on the next date or as early as possible, acknowledging the delays in the proceedings. Held that timely resolution of applications is essential for the integrity of insolvency proceedings (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Adjudicating Authority should expedite the hearing of the pending Section 12A application.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The tribunal directed the Adjudicating Authority to endeavor to hear the pending Section 12A application on the next date or as early as possible, disposing of the application with this observation.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • Section 12A application
  • Adjudicating Authority's discretion
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 21

I.A. No. 3954 of 2026 in Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 519 of 2026

2026-05-29

Justice Ashok Bhushan, Indevar Pandey

Mr. Manish Paliwal, Ms. Ekta Bhasin, Ms. Aastha Trivedi, Mr. Asav Rajan, Mr. Devang Shrotriya, Ms. Kashish Chadha, Mr. Aditya Shah, Ms. Mallika Ahluwalia, Ms. Nimisha Jain

Sasmita Rani Samanta

Tata Capital Ltd., HDFC Bank

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application in insolvency proceedings

Remedy Sought

Expedited hearing of the Section 12A application

Filing Reason

Pending application under Section 12A

Previous Decisions

Application previously disposed of on 18/03/2026

Issues

Expedition of hearing for Section 12A application

Submissions/Arguments

Application listed on four occasions but still pending Further claims received by IRP HDFC Bank intends to file an intervention application

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal emphasized the necessity for timely hearings in insolvency proceedings to uphold the integrity of the process.

Judgment Excerpts

The Application being pending, we are not required to make any observation or issue any direction in this Appeal. Adjudicating Authority shall endeavour to hear the 12A Application on the next date or as early as possible.

Procedural History

Application filed in Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 519 of 2026, previously disposed of on 18/03/2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Section 12A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeals Regarding Remission of License Fees for Liquor Shops During Curfew. Court Clarifies that Applications for Remission Must Be Considered on Merits in Cases of Total Closure.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Case — Upholds High Court's Interpretation of Transactions as Mortgage by Conditional Sale. The court affirmed that the transactions were not outright sales but rather a mortgage by conditional sal...