National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Clarifies Scope of CIRP in Insolvency Appeals. The Tribunal affirmed that the CIRP should include specific projects of the Corporate Debtor in Lucknow and Rajasthan, correcting earlier misstatements.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal addressed applications seeking clarification on the scope of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) in two appeals concerning IL & FS Financial Services Ltd. The appeals were filed by Gagan Tandon and Pranav Ansal against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal, which admitted a Section 7 application. The Tribunal had previously upheld the admission of the application while confining the CIRP to specific projects in Lucknow and Rajasthan. The applicants contended that the directions issued did not align with the findings in the judgment, particularly regarding the inclusion of projects in Sushant Golf City. The Tribunal noted that the earlier order had been affirmed by the Supreme Court, and upon reviewing the submissions, clarified that the CIRP should indeed include the projects in Sushant Golf City along with the specified projects in Lucknow and Rajasthan. The applications were disposed of with this clarification, ensuring that the CIRP was accurately defined in accordance with the Tribunal's findings.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - Clarification of Directions - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 7 - The Tribunal clarified that the CIRP should be confined to specific projects of the Corporate Debtor, correcting earlier misstatements regarding the inclusion of projects in Sushant Golf City. Held that the CIRP is to include projects at Lucknow and specific assets in Rajasthan, ensuring clarity in the scope of the resolution process (Paras 1-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the directions regarding the scope of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) were correctly stated in the judgment.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal clarified that the CIRP should include projects in Sushant Golf City along with those in Lucknow and Rajasthan, correcting earlier misstatements in the judgment.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP)
  • clarification of directions
  • project confinement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 20

I.A. No. 3559 of 2026 in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 500 of 2025; I.A. No. 3560 of 2026 in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 502 of 2025

2026-05-25

Justice Ashok Bhushan, Barun Mitra

Mr. Abihshek Anand, Mr. Karan Kohli, Ms. Palak Kalra, Mr. Gopal Jain, Mr. Satendra K. Rai, Mr. Ritesh Agrawal, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Dubey, Mr. Abhishek Chaudhry, Mr. Shah Rukh Khan, Ms. Tanya Verma

Gagan Tandon & Ors., Pranav Ansal

IL & FS Financial Services Ltd. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Clarification of directions regarding the scope of CIRP in insolvency appeals.

Remedy Sought

Clarification of the scope of the CIRP as per the Tribunal's earlier judgment.

Filing Reason

To address discrepancies in the directions regarding the inclusion of projects in Sushant Golf City.

Previous Decisions

The order dated 25.02.2025 admitting the Section 7 application was upheld.

Issues

Whether the directions regarding the scope of the CIRP were correctly stated in the judgment.

Submissions/Arguments

The applicants argued that the directions did not align with the findings in the judgment. The respondents contended that the CIRP should include all registered projects of the Corporate Debtor.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the need for clarity in the scope of the CIRP, ensuring that all relevant projects of the Corporate Debtor are included as per the findings in the judgment.

Judgment Excerpts

The order dated 25.02.2025 passed by National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi Bench Court - IV admitting Section 7 application is upheld. The CIRP needs to be confined to project Mother City Lucknow and Mother City Extension Lucknow, including Sushant Golf City Project as well as three Projects of the CD situated in the State of Rajasthan.

Procedural History

The applications I.A. No. 3559 and I.A. No. 3560 were filed seeking clarification on the directions issued in the judgment regarding the CIRP.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Section 7
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Pronounces Judgment on Challenges to Additional Fees Imposed by Central Motor Vehicles Rules. Rule 32 and Rule 81 Under Scrutiny for Alleged Unlawful Levy on Delayed Renewals and Transfers
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Builder's Challenge to Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction in Chennai. Court Holds Regularization is Not an Absolute Right; Unauthorized Commercial Floors Constructed Beyond Approved Plan Must Be Demolished Und...