NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Upholds Appellant's Request for Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeals — Delay Found Justifiable. Condonation of delay granted as sufficient cause was shown for the delay in filing the appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) addressed the issue of delay in filing appeals by Acrow Realcon Pvt. Ltd. against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal dated 13.02.2026. The appeals were e-filed on 30.03.2026, which was the 45th day after the impugned order, and the Appellants sought condonation of a 15-day delay. The Respondent objected, arguing that the e-filing at 9 P.M. on 30.03.2026 should be treated as filed on the next working day, 31.03.2026, based on the Delhi High Court E-filing Rules. The Tribunal examined the NCLAT Rules, 2016, particularly Rule 22 regarding the presentation of appeals and Rule 103 concerning electronic filing. It noted that the limitation period for filing appeals under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) could be extended by 15 days if sufficient cause was shown. The Tribunal found that the Appellants provided adequate reasons for the delay, including the complexity of the judgment and the need for internal approvals. Ultimately, the Tribunal held that the appeal was validly filed on 30.03.2026 and allowed the condonation of delay, listing the appeals for hearing on 10.07.2026.

Headnote

A) Limitation Law - Condonation of Delay - Justifiable Delay - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 61 - The Appellant provided sufficient explanation for the 15 days' delay in filing the appeals, which was within the condonable period. The Tribunal held that the delay was justified due to the complexity of the judgment and the need for internal approvals before filing (Paras 25-26).

B) E-filing Rules - Computation of Limitation - NCLAT Rules, 2016, Rule 22 - The Tribunal clarified that limitation shall be computed from the date of e-filing, and the appeal filed at 9.00 P.M. on 30.03.2026 was considered valid for that date, not the next working day (Paras 21-22).

C) Interpretation of 'Day' - Definition of Day - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 61 - The Tribunal interpreted 'day' as a 24-hour period beginning at midnight, allowing the appeal to be filed until the end of the day (Paras 19-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal e-filed by the Appellant on 30.03.2026 at 9.00 P.M. can be treated as filed on that date or the next working day.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal allowed the applications for condonation of delay, finding sufficient cause for the 15-day delay in filing the appeals. The appeals were deemed filed on 30.03.2026.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing rules
  • limitation period
  • interpretation of 'day'
  • NCLAT Rules
  • 2016
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 19

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 755 - 758 of 2026

2026-05-29

Ashok Bhushan

Mr. K. Datta, Sr. Adv., Mr. Prateek Gupta, Mr. Himanshu Satija, Ms. Eshna Kumar

Acrow Realcon Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Union Bank of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal regarding insolvency proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Condonation of delay in filing appeals.

Filing Reason

Delay due to complexity of judgment and need for internal approvals.

Previous Decisions

The impugned order was passed on 13.02.2026.

Issues

Whether the appeal e-filed by the Appellant on 30.03.2026 at 9.00 P.M. can be treated as filed on that date or the next working day.

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued that the delay was justified due to the complexity of the judgment and the need for internal approvals. The Respondent contended that e-filing after working hours should be treated as filed on the next working day.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that the limitation period for filing appeals under Section 61 of the IBC is computed from the date of e-filing, and the definition of 'day' allows for filing until midnight of the last day.

Judgment Excerpts

The present appeals have been e-filed on 30.03.2026. The filing counter of the Registry shall be open on all working days from 10.30 AM to 5.00 P.M. Limitation shall be computed from the date of e-filing. The word 'day' means a period of 24 Hrs beginning at midnight. We find sufficient explanation given by the Appellant for explaining 15 days’ delay in filing the Appeals.

Procedural History

The applications for condonation of delay were filed after the impugned order dated 13.02.2026, and the appeals were e-filed on 30.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 61
  • Companies Act, 2013: Section 469
  • NCLAT Rules, 2016: Rule 22, Rule 103, Rule 104
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Directs State to Ensure Safety and Welfare of Child Workers in Match Factories. The court emphasized the need for minimum wage and welfare measures for child laborers under Articles 39(f) and 45 of the Constitution.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Limitation Act Case — Clarifies Applicability of Articles 56 and 119. The court held that the term 'price' in Article 56 does not apply to professional services rendered for a fee, thus the suit is governed by Arti...