National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeals Against Withdrawal of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The adjudicating authority's decision to allow withdrawal was upheld as it followed the prescribed procedure under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal addressed two appeals filed against an order dated 27.08.2025 by the National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata, which allowed an application under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for the withdrawal of a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The corporate debtor, West Bengal Agro Textile Corporation Limited, faced a Section 9 application filed by operational creditor Jitendra Jain, alleging a default in payment of Rs. 1,19,36,635. A settlement agreement was reached between the corporate debtor and Jitendra Jain on 18.08.2025, leading to a request for withdrawal of the CIRP. The Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) filed an application for withdrawal on 25.08.2025, which was subsequently allowed by the adjudicating authority. The appellants contended that their pending Section 9 applications should have been considered before allowing the withdrawal. The court noted that the IRP had not published any notice or constituted a Committee of Creditors, and the withdrawal application was filed in accordance with the prescribed procedure. The court emphasized that the adjudicating authority was not required to hear all stakeholders before allowing the withdrawal, as no objections were raised by the appellants. The court ultimately upheld the adjudicating authority's decision, stating that the withdrawal was in accordance with the law and did not adversely affect the rights of other creditors (Paras 1-24).

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Withdrawal of Application - Procedure for Withdrawal - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 12A - The adjudicating authority allowed the application for withdrawal of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 12A without hearing the appellants, who had filed independent applications under Section 9. The court held that the procedure under Regulation 30A permits withdrawal before the constitution of the Committee of Creditors, and no objections were raised by the appellants at the time of withdrawal (Paras 10-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the adjudicating authority erred in allowing the withdrawal of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process without considering the claims of the appellants.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority's order allowing the withdrawal of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, stating that the procedure was followed correctly and no objections were raised by the appellants.

Law Points

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • 2016
  • Section 12A
  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
  • Regulation 30A
  • Settlement Agreement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (05) 17

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1668 of 2025 & 1749 of 2025

2025-08-27

Ashok Bhushan

Mr. Akshay Jain, CA, Mr. Rishabh Jain, Mr. A Kumar, Ms. Kavya, Ms. Shruti Jain, Ms. Ashika Jain, Mr. Shounak Mitra, Mr. Vivek Gautam

Chandra Prakash Lohia @ Nitesh Lohia, Basanti Devi Lohia

West Bengal Agro Textile Corporation Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals against the order allowing withdrawal of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to challenge the withdrawal of the CIRP.

Filing Reason

Alleged error in allowing withdrawal without considering the appellants' claims.

Previous Decisions

The adjudicating authority allowed the withdrawal application under Section 12A.

Issues

Whether the adjudicating authority erred in allowing the withdrawal of the CIRP without considering the claims of the appellants.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that their pending Section 9 applications should have been considered before allowing the withdrawal. Respondents contended that the withdrawal was in accordance with the prescribed procedure and no objections were raised.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the procedure for withdrawal under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, allows for withdrawal before the constitution of the Committee of Creditors, and the adjudicating authority is not obliged to hear all stakeholders if no objections are raised.

Judgment Excerpts

The adjudicating authority allowed the application for withdrawal of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 12A without hearing the appellants. The procedure under Regulation 30A permits withdrawal before the constitution of the Committee of Creditors. No objections were raised by the appellants at the time of withdrawal.

Procedural History

The appeals were filed against the order dated 27.08.2025 allowing the withdrawal of the CIRP under Section 12A, following the filing of a settlement agreement and subsequent application by the Interim Resolution Professional.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 12A
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016: Regulation 30A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Dismisses Employer's Appeal in ESI Contribution Dispute — Failure to Produce Records Justifies Section 45A Assessment. Employer's inability to produce records due to passage of time does not invalidate ESI Corporation's demand ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Trust Modification for Secular Objectives — Cypres Doctrine Applied.