National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeals Against Rejection of Resolution Plan Due to Conflict of Interest and Statutory Dues Issues. The Resolution Plan was found non-compliant with Section 30 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, failing to adequately address statutory liabilities and fairness in creditor treatment.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeals arose from the rejection of a Resolution Plan submitted by Micro Capitals Private Limited, the majority financial creditor of KSS Limited, during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had rejected the plan on 24.03.2025, citing several deficiencies including lack of genuine fund infusion and non-compliance with statutory requirements. The Appellant contended that the plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) with requisite majority and that the NCLT's rejection was based on extraneous grounds. The Respondents, including the Commissioner of Income Tax and the Principal Chief Commissioner of Customs, argued that the plan unfairly treated statutory dues and was vitiated by conflict of interest, as the Appellant was both the Resolution Applicant and a dominant creditor. The court analyzed the submissions, emphasizing the need for compliance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, particularly regarding the treatment of operational creditors and the feasibility of the plan. Ultimately, the court upheld the NCLT's decision, affirming that the rejection was warranted due to the plan's failure to meet legal standards and protect the interests of all stakeholders involved.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Resolution Plan Approval - Grounds for Rejection - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 30 - The Adjudicating Authority rejected the Resolution Plan on grounds including absence of genuine fund infusion and conflict of interest, which were deemed valid as they contravened statutory requirements and fairness principles. Held that the rejection was justified (Paras 4-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the rejection of the Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority was justified under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal upheld the rejection of the Resolution Plan, affirming that it did not comply with the requirements of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, particularly regarding the treatment of statutory creditors and the feasibility of the plan.

Law Points

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • 2016
  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
  • Resolution Plan approval
  • Committee of Creditors
  • conflict of interest
  • statutory dues treatment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (06) 66

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 714 of 2025 and Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 721 of 2025

2026-06-30

Indevar Pandey

Mr. Amit Agrawal, Mr. Sarthak Wadhwa, Ms. Sana Jain, Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Ms. Drishti Rawal, Mr. Mayur Goyal, Mr. Dhaval Mehrotra, Mr. Aditi Desai, Ms. Honey Satpal, Mr. Akash Aggarwalla, Mr. Aman

Micro Capitals Private Limited, Mr. Dharmendra Dhelariya

Commissioner of Income Tax, Principal Chief Commissioner of Customs, Principal Officer of SEBI

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the rejection of a Resolution Plan during Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.

Remedy Sought

Micro Capitals Private Limited sought approval of its Resolution Plan.

Filing Reason

The Adjudicating Authority rejected the Resolution Plan on various grounds.

Previous Decisions

The NCLT had previously admitted the petition for CIRP and appointed a Resolution Professional.

Issues

Whether the rejection of the Resolution Plan was justified under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Whether the Appellant's dual role as a creditor and Resolution Applicant created a conflict of interest.

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued that the Resolution Plan was approved by the CoC and should not have been rejected. The Respondents contended that the plan failed to treat statutory dues equitably and was vitiated by conflict of interest.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized that the approval of a Resolution Plan must comply with statutory requirements and ensure equitable treatment of all creditors, particularly operational creditors and statutory authorities.

Judgment Excerpts

The Adjudicating Authority rejected the Resolution Plan on grounds including absence of genuine fund infusion and conflict of interest. The rejection was justified as they contravened statutory requirements and fairness principles. The court emphasized that the approval of a Resolution Plan must comply with statutory requirements.

Procedural History

The appeals were filed against the NCLT's order dated 24.03.2025 rejecting the Resolution Plan submitted by the Appellant during the CIRP of KSS Limited.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 7, Section 30, Section 31, Section 32A, Section 53
  • Customs Act, 1962:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Application, Upholds Modvat Credit for Lancing Pipe as Input. Lancing pipe used for passing oxygen into molten metal is wholly consumed and qualifies as input under Rule 57A of Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Land Acquisition for Public Purpose. The court upheld the authority's subjective satisfaction regarding land suitability for public purpose under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.