NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Dismisses Appeal in Contempt Proceedings Against Resolution Professional. The court upheld the necessity of the resolution professional's involvement in contempt proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, emphasizing his duty to explain the implementation of the resolution plan.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by Alok Industries Ltd. against an order of the Adjudicating Authority that required the resolution professional to appear in contempt proceedings initiated by workmen after the implementation of the resolution plan. The appellant contended that all dues to the workmen had been fully paid under the resolution plan and that the contempt application was misconceived. The Adjudicating Authority had previously ordered the resolution professional to explain the situation, which the appellant argued was unnecessary. However, the court found that the resolution professional had a duty to clarify the matter, especially since he was also the Chairman of the Monitoring Committee. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for lack of merit. Additionally, the court noted that the contempt application had been pending for nearly four years and directed the Adjudicating Authority to expedite its hearing and resolve it within two months.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Contempt Proceedings - Impleading of Resolution Professional - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - The appeal challenged the impleading of the resolution professional in contempt proceedings initiated by workmen after the resolution plan was implemented. The court held that the resolution professional has a duty to explain the matter before the Adjudicating Authority, thus dismissing the appeal (Paras 1-3).

B) Company Law - Expedited Hearing - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - The court directed the Adjudicating Authority to expedite the hearing of the pending contempt application, emphasizing the need for timely resolution of disputes arising from the implementation of the resolution plan (Paras 4-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the resolution professional should be impleaded in the contempt application filed by workmen.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was dismissed, and the court directed the Adjudicating Authority to expedite the hearing of the contempt application and dispose of it within two months.

Law Points

  • Contempt proceedings
  • resolution plan implementation
  • duty of resolution professional
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (06) 63

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No.1217 of 2025 & I.A. No.4757, 4758, 4759 of 2025

2026-06-30

Justice N. Seshasayee, Arun Baroka, Indevar Pandey

Ms. Petrushka Des Gupta, Mr. Mridul Yadav, Mr. Anand Singh Sengar, Ms. Sayalee Dolas

Alok Industries Ltd.

Ashvanee Kumar Singh & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the impleading of the resolution professional in contempt proceedings.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to dismiss the order requiring the resolution professional's appearance.

Filing Reason

The contempt application was filed by workmen alleging non-payment under the resolution plan.

Previous Decisions

The Adjudicating Authority had ordered the resolution professional to appear and explain the matter.

Issues

Whether the resolution professional should be impleaded in the contempt application Whether the contempt application was misconceived

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that all dues were paid and the application was misconceived. The court noted the resolution professional's duty to explain the matter.

Ratio Decidendi

The resolution professional has a duty to explain matters related to the implementation of the resolution plan in contempt proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeal is directed by the successful resolution applicant challenging an Order of the Adjudicating Authority. The learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the entire amount due payable to the workmen under the plan has been fully paid. In view of the discussion we have herein recorded, we find that there is no merit in the appeal.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the order of the Adjudicating Authority requiring the resolution professional to appear in contempt proceedings initiated by workmen after the resolution plan was implemented.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Against Appointment of Advocate Commissioner in Partition Suit — Preliminary Decree Sufficient for Commissioner Appointment. Appointment of Advocate Commissioner to suggest mode of division does not require a se...
Related Judgement
Tribunals National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Upholds Appeals in Insolvency Matters — Condonation of Delay Granted. The Tribunal affirmed the authority of the Committee of Creditors to replace the Resolution Professional without requiring notice to the i...