National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Replacement of IRP in Corporate Insolvency Proceedings Due to Multiple Case Assignments. Tribunal Directed NCLT to Address Replacement Application Promptly.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved applications for the replacement of the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) in the corporate insolvency resolution process concerning Atma Ram House Investment Pvt. Ltd. The appellant, Devi Singh, a suspended director of the company, filed the applications citing that the IRP, Sh. Santanu T. Ray, was handling more than 10 cases, which disqualified him from being appointed as IRP. The Tribunal noted that the Committee of Creditors (CoC) had not yet been formed and referred to previous orders indicating that the debt's classification as financial or not was still under examination. The Tribunal acknowledged that the applications had not been moved before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and thus disposed of them, granting liberty to the applicant to file appropriate applications before the NCLT for the replacement of the IRP. The Tribunal requested that the NCLT dispose of any such application preferably within two weeks. The counsel for the Resolution Professional (RP) pointed out that such applications should have been filed before the NCLT. The decision emphasized the need for procedural compliance in insolvency matters.

Headnote

A) Corporate Insolvency - Replacement of Interim Resolution Professional - Grounds for Replacement - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section Not mentioned - Applications were filed for the replacement of the IRP on the grounds of having more than 10 cases, which legally disqualified him from serving as IRP. The Tribunal disposed of the applications, allowing the applicant to move the NCLT for replacement and requested prompt disposal of such application. Held that the matter should be addressed by the NCLT (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) should be replaced due to having multiple cases assigned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal disposed of the applications for replacement of the IRP, allowing the applicant to file a new application before the NCLT and requested prompt disposal of such application.

Law Points

  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
  • replacement of Interim Resolution Professional
  • Committee of Creditors formation
  • application before NCLT
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (06) 56

I.A. No. 4064 of 2026 in Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 1812 of 2025

2026-06-01

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Mr. Naresh Salecha

Ms. Akanksha Nehra, Mr. Varnit Vashistha, Mr. Ribhu Garg, Ms. Tanya Hasija, Mr. Dhaval Bothra, Mr. Spandan Biswal, Mr. Shivendra Pandey

Devi Singh

Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for replacement of Interim Resolution Professional in insolvency proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Replacement of the Interim Resolution Professional.

Filing Reason

IRP was handling more than 10 cases, disqualifying him from serving.

Previous Decisions

Previous orders noted the commencement of CIRP and the need for the IRP to take further steps.

Issues

Replacement of IRP due to multiple case assignments

Submissions/Arguments

The IRP cannot be appointed due to handling multiple cases. The application for replacement should have been filed before the NCLT.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the importance of procedural compliance in insolvency matters and the necessity for the NCLT to address applications regarding the replacement of the IRP.

Judgment Excerpts

These applications are filed for replacement of the IRP. We request the Ld. NCLT to dispose of the application preferably within two weeks.

Procedural History

Applications I.A. No. 4064 and I.A. No. 4065 of 2026 were filed for the replacement of the IRP, following previous orders regarding the commencement of CIRP.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Directs State to Allot Forest Land to Scheduled Tribe Dwellers Under Forest Rights Act, 2006 — Failure to Act on Government Order Violates Constitutional Rights. The court held that the State is bound to implement its own order f...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Corruption and Misappropriation Case — Sentence Reduced. The court found that the current charges were distinct from previous prosecutions, allowing the case to proceed under Section 300 of the Code of...