Case Note & Summary
The case involved an appeal by the suspended director of Platino Classic Motors Pvt Ltd against an order passed by the Learned Adjudicating Authority in Kochi. The appellant questioned the order dated 18.11.2021, which directed him to place his claim before the newly appointed Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). Throughout the proceedings, the appellant failed to appear or participate, prompting the Tribunal to issue fresh notices as per an earlier order dated 11.09.2025. Despite these efforts, the appellant did not respond, leading the Tribunal to conclude that he was not interested in pursuing the appeal. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's lack of diligence and closed all pending interlocutory applications.
Headnote
A) Company Law - Appeal Dismissal - Lack of Diligence - Companies Act, 2013 - The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as the appellant failed to appear and participate in the proceedings, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter. The Tribunal noted that despite issuing notices, there was no response from the appellant, leading to the conclusion that the appeal should be dismissed (Paras 1-2).
Issue of Consideration
Whether the appeal should be dismissed due to the appellant's lack of participation in the proceedings
Final Decision
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's lack of diligence in participating in the proceedings, and all pending interlocutory applications were closed.
Law Points
- Company law
- appeal dismissal
- lack of diligence
Case Details
2026 LawText (NCLAT) (06) 36
Comp App (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.58/2022
Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Jatindranath Swain
BMW India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more)
Subscribe Now
Nature of Litigation
Company appeal against an order of the Adjudicating Authority
Remedy Sought
The appellant sought to challenge the order directing him to place his claim before the new IRP
Filing Reason
The appellant questioned the order passed by the Learned Adjudicating Authority
Previous Decisions
The Tribunal had previously issued notices and recorded the absence of the appellant
Issues
Whether the appeal should be dismissed due to lack of participation
Whether the appellant showed interest in pursuing the appeal
Submissions/Arguments
The appellant failed to appear and participate in the proceedings
The Tribunal issued notices but received no response from the appellant
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed based on the appellant's failure to engage in the proceedings, reflecting a lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
Judgment Excerpts
The Company Appeal would stand 'dismissed' due to lack of diligence on part of the Appellant in participating in the proceedings.
Till date, there is no response by the Appellant and in that eventuality, it apparently reflects that the Appellant is not interested to pursue the instant Company Appeal at all.
Procedural History
The appeal was filed against an order dated 18.11.2021. The Tribunal noted the appellant's absence in proceedings and issued notices on 11.09.2025, which went unanswered, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
Acts & Sections
