National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Company Appeal Following Settlement. The Appellant sought to withdraw the appeal after a settlement was reached, which was not opposed by the Respondent's Counsel.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a Company Appeal filed by the suspended director of 63Ideas Infolabs Pvt. Ltd. against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) admitting an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Appellant challenged the NCLT's order dated 31.10.2025, which directed the commencement of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor. On 09.12.2025, the Tribunal issued an interim order, requiring the Appellant to deposit Rs. 3.5 crores to keep the operation of the NCLT's order in abeyance. The Appellant complied with this order, and the Demand Draft was held during the appeal's pendency. Subsequently, a settlement was reached between the parties, as reflected in a memorandum accepted by the Respondent's Counsel. The Appellant requested to withdraw the appeal, citing a subsequent order from the NCLT on 27.04.2026, which confirmed the settlement. The Respondent's Counsel did not oppose this request. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Company Appeal as withdrawn, aligning with the settlement reached and the NCLT's order.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - Dismissal of Appeal - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 12A - The Appellant sought to withdraw the Company Appeal after a settlement was reached, which was not opposed by the Respondent's Counsel. The Tribunal directed the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn in light of the settlement and the order of the NCLT dated 27.04.2026. Held that the appeal was dismissed as per the request of the Appellant (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Company Appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn following a settlement between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 625/2025 was dismissed as withdrawn, in terms of the order of NCLT dated 27.04.2026.

Law Points

  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
  • Section 9
  • I & B Code
  • 2016
  • Interim Orders
  • Settlement of Disputes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (06) 35

Comp App (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 625/2025

2026-06-11

Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Jatindranath Swain

Mr. Pranav Gopalakrishnan, Mr. Mayan H Jain, Mr. VV Sivakumar, Mr. Tejas S.R, Mr. Addanki Haresh

KK Kartheeswaran

Ranchpride Agrocomm Pvt. Ltd., Addanki Haresh

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Company Appeal challenging the admission of an application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Remedy Sought

The Appellant sought to withdraw the Company Appeal.

Filing Reason

The appeal was filed against the NCLT's order admitting an application under Section 9 of the I & B Code.

Previous Decisions

The NCLT's order dated 31.10.2025 admitted the application and directed CIRP against the corporate debtor.

Issues

Whether the Company Appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn following a settlement.

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued for withdrawal based on a settlement. The Respondent's Counsel did not oppose the withdrawal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal upheld the withdrawal of the appeal based on the settlement reached between the parties, confirming the NCLT's order.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appellant would deposit Rs.3.5 Crores before the registry of this Appellate Tribunal, within a period of 2 weeks from today. Accordingly, the Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 625/2025 is directed to be dismissed as withdrawn.

Procedural History

The Appellant filed the Company Appeal against the NCLT's order dated 31.10.2025. An interim order was passed on 09.12.2025, requiring a deposit. The appeal was pending until a settlement was reached, leading to the withdrawal request.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 9, Section 12A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Accused in Murder Case Due to Incompetent Certificate of Fitness on Factual Grounds. Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Based on Dying Declarations Upheld as Dying Declaration Need Not Be Corroborated if Found True, an...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeals Partly in Murder by Poisoning Case Upholding Conviction of Primary Accused and Acquitting Two Co-Accused. Circumstantial Evidence of Poisoning and Disposal of Body Proved Death Was Homicidal Despite Absence of Detected Po...