National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal as Infructuous Due to Delayed Claim Submission. The Appellant's claim was rejected as it was submitted 528 days late after the approval of the Resolution Plan by the Committee of Creditors.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Employees Provident Fund Organisation filed a company appeal questioning an order dated 09.07.2024, which rejected its claim as delayed. The claim was submitted on 11.12.2023, almost six months after the approval of the Resolution Plan by the Committee of Creditors (CoC). The Tribunal found that the claim was belated and justified the Resolution Professional's rejection of it. The appeal was heard on 03.06.2026, and during the proceedings, the Appellant's counsel presented an order from the NCLT Bengaluru regarding the approval of a plan in a related matter. The Tribunal noted that since the plan had been approved, the issue of the belated claim no longer warranted consideration. The Appellant's counsel conceded that there was nothing left to decide, leading to the conclusion that the appeal was rendered infructuous. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Delayed Claims - Consideration of belated claims post-approval of Resolution Plan - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - The Appellant's claim was rejected as it was submitted 528 days late after the approval of the Resolution Plan by the Committee of Creditors (CoC). The court held that the claim could not be considered due to its belated nature and the approval of the plan by the Adjudicating Authority, rendering the appeal infructuous (Paras 2-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the belated claim submitted after the approval of the Resolution Plan can be considered.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as infructuous due to the belated nature of the claim and the approval of the Resolution Plan.

Law Points

  • Delayed claims
  • Resolution Plan approval
  • Infructuous appeals
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (06) 34

Comp App (AT) (CH) (INS) No. 455 / 2024

2026-06-15

Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Jatindranath Swain

Mr. R. Vishnu

Employees Provident Fund Organisation

CA Shirley Mathew

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Company appeal regarding the rejection of a delayed claim.

Remedy Sought

The Appellant sought to have its claim considered despite its delay.

Filing Reason

Claim was filed after the approval of the Resolution Plan.

Previous Decisions

The claim was previously rejected by the Resolution Professional.

Issues

Whether the belated claim submitted after the approval of the Resolution Plan can be considered.

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued for consideration of the belated claim. The Respondent maintained that the claim was rightly rejected due to its delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The claim could not be considered due to its belated submission after the approval of the Resolution Plan, rendering the appeal infructuous.

Judgment Excerpts

the claim as raised by the Appellant... was determined to be a delayed claim the claim itself couldn’t have been considered apart from being belated the company appeal... has been rendered infructuous

Procedural History

The appeal was filed questioning the order dated 09.07.2024, heard on 03.06.2026, and dismissed on 15.06.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Hostile Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 302, 307, 324, 114 IPC and Section 135 of Bombay Police Act Upheld as Prosecution Faile...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Interim Orders on Legal Remembrancer Manual Amendments — Upholds State Authority's Competence. The High Court's direction to consider applications under repealed provisions was found to be legally unsustainable.