National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Closes Company Appeal Due to Consent Order Implementation. Appellant's Rights Remain Under Consideration in Pending Appeal.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose in the context of a company appeal concerning the liquidation of M/s. JKS The Banyaan Private Limited. The Appellants, who were suspended directors and a related party, challenged an order from the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) that directed the Bank of Baroda to hand over original title deeds of a property to the liquidator. The Appellants argued that this order violated their rights as they were not impleaded in the proceedings, which they claimed breached the principles of natural justice. The Tribunal noted that the order had already been implemented and the title documents had been handed over to the liquidator, rendering the challenge somewhat moot. The Appellants were pursuing another appeal concerning the same property, which was still pending. The Tribunal emphasized that the principles of natural justice do not apply uniformly in all cases, particularly when the order was made with the consent of the affected party, in this case, the Bank of Baroda. The Tribunal ultimately decided to close the appeal, allowing the Appellants to continue seeking relief in their pending appeal without prejudice to their rights. The decision underscored that the Appellants could still address their grievances in the ongoing proceedings regarding the liquidation and title documents.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Natural Justice - Violation of Principles - Companies Act, 2013 - The Appellant contended that the impugned order was passed without impleading him, violating natural justice principles. The Tribunal held that adherence to natural justice is not mandatory in all proceedings, especially when the order was by consent and did not prejudice the Appellant's rights, which remain under consideration in a pending appeal. Held that the appeal was closed without merit consideration (Paras 4-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned order violated principles of natural justice and affected the pending company appeal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal closed the company appeal, allowing the Appellants to pursue their rights in the pending appeal without prejudice.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • company appeal
  • interim order
  • liquidation proceedings
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (06) 29

Comp App (AT) (CH) ( Ins ) No. 305 /2026

2026-06-24

Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Jatindranath Swain

Mr. Pawan Jhabakh, Mr. B. Dhanaraj, Ms. Vidya

MR. DINESH KOTHARI, MRS. KAMALA KOTHARI, MRS. URMILA KOTHARI

MS. RAJALAKSHMI VARADARAJAN, BANK OF BARODA

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Company appeal concerning the liquidation of a private limited company.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to challenge the NCLT order regarding the handing over of title deeds.

Filing Reason

The Appellants claimed violation of natural justice in the NCLT's order.

Previous Decisions

The NCLT had previously directed the handing over of title deeds to the liquidator.

Issues

Violation of natural justice principles Impact of the impugned order on pending appeal

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellants argued that they were not impleaded in the proceedings, violating their rights. The Respondent Bank consented to the order, indicating no objection to handing over the title deeds.

Ratio Decidendi

The principles of natural justice do not apply uniformly in all proceedings, especially when the order was made with consent and did not prejudice the rights of the Appellant.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appellant questions the propriety of the impugned order dated 27.04.2026. The solitary ground, which has been agitated by the Appellant in this company appeal is that, the order is in violation of the principles of natural justice.

Procedural History

The Appellant filed a company appeal against the NCLT order directing the handing over of title deeds, which was already implemented.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 25(2)(i), Section 66
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petitions Challenging Closure of Cross-Examination Rights Due to Misuse of Adjournments. Repeated Adjournments Undermine Justice Delivery System and Delay Proceedings, Justifying Closure of Cross-Examination Righ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA's 10-Year Transfer Ban on Rehab Tenements as Unconstitutional and Ultra Vires. Condition in NOC restricting sale/transfer of tenancy rights for ten years from occupation held to be without statutory authority and viola...