NCLAT Allows Restoration Applications in Company Appeals — Cost Imposition Quashed. The Tribunal's failure to justify cost imposition led to the quashing of the order under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Income Tax Department filed a series of Company Appeals challenging an order from the NCLT that restored the registration of certain companies and imposed a cost of Rs. 25,000 on the Department for the restoration process. The appeals were filed on 16.09.2025, but were initially dismissed due to defects in filing, which the Department later sought to rectify through restoration applications. The Tribunal allowed the restoration applications, acknowledging the reasons for the delay in rectifying defects. The core issue revolved around the imposition of costs, which the Income Tax Department argued was unwarranted as it was acting in its statutory capacity. The NCLAT found that the Tribunal had not justified the cost imposition adequately and that the Income Tax Department should not be penalized for fulfilling its statutory duties. Consequently, the NCLAT quashed the cost imposition and ordered a refund of the amount already paid by the Department.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Restoration of Company Registration - Imposition of Costs - Companies Act, 2013, Section 252(3) - The Tribunal directed the Income Tax Department to pay costs for restoration of companies, which was challenged. The court held that the imposition of costs was not justified as the Income Tax Department was performing its statutory duties and no quantification of costs was provided by the Tribunal (Paras 10-17).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the imposition of costs on the Income Tax Department for restoration of company registration was justified.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The NCLAT allowed the appeals, quashed the imposition of costs of Rs. 25,000, and ordered a refund of the amount already paid by the Income Tax Department within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Restoration of company registration
  • Imposition of costs
  • Condonation of delay
  • Statutory duties
  • NCLT Rules
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (06) 18

Restoration (AT) (CH) No. 06/2026

2026-06-17

Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Jatindranath Swain

Ms. Rakshitha Kalva

The Income Tax Department

The Registrar of Companies & Anr

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the imposition of costs for restoration of company registration.

Remedy Sought

The Income Tax Department sought to quash the cost imposition and obtain a refund.

Filing Reason

The appeals were filed to challenge the imposition of costs in the restoration of company registrations.

Previous Decisions

The NCLT had previously ordered the restoration of companies and imposed costs.

Issues

Justification of cost imposition Authority of Tribunal to impose costs

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued that the costs were unjustified as it was performing statutory duties. The Respondent contended that costs were necessary to cover expenses incurred during the restoration process.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal must justify the imposition of costs, especially when a statutory body is fulfilling its duties; failure to do so renders the cost imposition unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The imposition of cost of Rs. 25,000 on the Appellant becomes necessary for the purposes of meeting the expenditure to be incurred by RoC. The order of imposition of cost in itself would be bad and not sustainable.

Procedural History

The appeals were filed on 16.09.2025, dismissed for defects on 23.01.2026, and restoration applications were subsequently filed.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013: 252(3), 421
  • NCLT Rules, 2016: 87A(4)(c)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in ESI Act Case — High Court's Findings Reversed. The High Court's interference with the Insurance Court's findings was deemed unjustified as it did not consider the reasons provided by the lower court.
Related Judgement
Tribunals National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Appellant to File Reply with Conditions. The Tribunal determined that the appellant should be granted a final opportunity to file a reply, subject to costs, as no grave prejudice would be caused to the r...