National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal as Withdrawn with Liberty to Revive Due to Amicable Settlement. Appeal was allowed to be withdrawn with a condition for revival in case of breach of settlement terms.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 14
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arose from an order dismissing an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The appellant, M/s. Srei Equipment Finance Limited, represented by Advocate Ms. Poornima Devi, sought to withdraw the appeal after amicably resolving the matter with the respondent, Kothavalsa Infraventures Pvt. Ltd. The appellant indicated that a repayment schedule had been provided to the respondent and requested the court to allow the withdrawal with the provision that the appeal could be revived if the respondent failed to adhere to the settlement terms. The court, acknowledging the amicable resolution, permitted the withdrawal of the appeal and dismissed it as withdrawn, while also granting the appellant the liberty to revive the appeal should there be a breach of the settlement terms by the respondent. The decision was made by Justice N. Seshasayee and Member (Technical) Jatindranath Swain.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Withdrawal of Appeal - Conditions for Revival - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 7 - The appellant sought to withdraw the appeal after amicable resolution of the matter, with a condition to revive the appeal if the respondent breaches the settlement terms. The court permitted the withdrawal while granting liberty to the appellant to revive the appeal in case of non-compliance by the respondent (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal can be withdrawn and under what conditions it can be revived.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was permitted to be withdrawn and was dismissed as withdrawn. The appellant was granted liberty to revive the appeal if the respondent failed to comply with the terms of settlement.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of appeal
  • Settlement terms
  • Liberty to revive appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (07) 125

Comp App (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 4 19 /2025

2026-07-31

Justice N. Seshasayee, Jatindranath Swain

Ms. Poornima Devi, Mr. Anando Mukherjee, Mr. Vishnu Mohan

M/s. Srei Equipment Finance Limited

Kothavalsa Infraventures Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against an order dismissing an application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to withdraw the appeal.

Filing Reason

The appeal was filed against the dismissal of an application under Section 7 of the IBC.

Previous Decisions

The application under Section 7 was dismissed prior to this appeal.

Issues

Conditions for withdrawal of appeal Revival of appeal upon breach of settlement

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant stated that the matter was amicably resolved and sought withdrawal. Appellant requested liberty to revive the appeal in case of breach of settlement terms.

Ratio Decidendi

The court allowed the withdrawal of the appeal while ensuring that the appellant retains the right to revive the appeal in case of non-compliance with the settlement terms.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeal is accordingly permitted to be withdrawn and is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the appellant is granted liberty to revive this appeal in the eventuality of the respondent failing to comply with the terms of settlement.

Procedural History

The appeal arose from an order dismissing an application under Section 7 of the IBC, followed by the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal after a settlement.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 7
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Specific Performance Case with Conditions. Court affirms trial court's decree for specific performance but imposes additional payment condition due to increased property value.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Confiscation Order Under Section 130 of CGST Act for Lack of Mens Rea — Petitioner's Goods and Conveyance Seized During Inter-State Transport, Order Set Aside as Proceedings Under Section 130 Require Intent to Evade ...