NCLAT Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Matter Due to Delay in Filing. Delay of 32 Days in Filing Appeal Not Condonable Under Section 61(2) of I&B Code.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a company appeal filed by the appellants against an order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on 28.01.2026, which admitted an application under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (I&B Code). The appellants received the certified copy of the NCLT order on 18.03.2026 and filed the appeal on 31.03.2026, which was 62 days after the order. The appellants argued that the limitation period for filing the appeal was 45 days under Section 421(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, claiming that they filed the appeal within this period. However, the court noted that the appeal should have been filed within 30 days as per Section 61 of the I&B Code, which meant the last date for filing was 27.02.2026. The court found that the appellants had knowledge of the proceedings and were obligated to file the appeal within the stipulated time. The delay of 32 days in filing the appeal was deemed inexcusable, and the application for condonation of delay was rejected. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on the grounds of limitation.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Limitation for Appeal - Delay in Filing - Companies Act, 2013, Section 421(3) - The appellant contended that the appeal was filed within the permissible period as per the Companies Act, but the court held that the appeal was actually filed beyond the limitation period prescribed under the I&B Code. The delay of 32 days was not condonable as per the provisions of Section 61(2) of the I&B Code, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in filing the appeal can be condoned under the provisions of the law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application for condonation of delay was rejected, and the company appeal was dismissed on the grounds of limitation.

Law Points

  • Limitation period
  • Condonation of delay
  • Appeal under I&B Code
  • Section 61
  • Section 421(3) of Companies Act
  • 2013
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (07) 123

Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 243/2026

2026-07-14

Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Jatindranath Swain

Mr. Bhagavath Krishnan, Dr. Pundla Bhaskara Mohan

Vangala Bikshapathi & Anr.

State Bank of India & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Company appeal against NCLT order

Remedy Sought

Condonation of delay in filing appeal

Filing Reason

Medical reasons for delay

Issues

Whether the delay in filing the appeal can be condoned Whether the appeal was filed within the prescribed limitation period

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the appeal was filed within the limitation period as per Companies Act Court noted that the appeal was filed beyond the limitation period under I&B Code

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed due to failure to file within the limitation period prescribed under the I&B Code, and the delay was not condonable.

Judgment Excerpts

The delay 32 days of delay in filing the Appeal cannot be condoned under the proviso under Section 61 (2) of the Code. Accordingly, the Condone Delay Application would stand rejected.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed after the NCLT order dated 28.01.2026, with the certified copy received on 18.03.2026 and the appeal e-filed on 31.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Section 61, Section 95
  • Companies Act: Section 421(3)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Election Petition Challenging Election of Appellant — Improper Rejection of Nomination Papers Found.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Consolidation Dispute — Upholds High Court's Affirmation of DDC's Order. The Deputy Director of Consolidation's decision was found compliant with the Allahabad High Court's directions and based on proper evide...