National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Upholds Admission of Corporate Debtor into CIRP — Debt and Default Established. The proceedings initiated under Section 7 of the IBC were valid despite challenges based on the RBI Circular.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved two appeals concerning the admission of Simbhaoli Sugar Limited into Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The appeals were filed by Gursimran Kaur Mann and Surender Pal Singh Mangat, representing sugarcane farmers. The NCLT had admitted the Corporate Debtor into CIRP on 11.07.2024, following a petition by Oriental Bank of Commerce, which later merged with Punjab National Bank, due to the Corporate Debtor's inability to repay its debts. The bank had classified the debtor's account as a Non-Performing Asset (NPA) and issued legal notices for repayment. The total outstanding debt was recorded at Rs. 1436.92 crores. The appellants argued that the proceedings were invalid due to the Supreme Court's ruling declaring the RBI Circular, which influenced the initiation of insolvency proceedings, as ultra vires. The court analyzed the arguments and determined that the NCLT's admission of the Corporate Debtor was valid, as the debt and default were established independently of the RBI Circular. The court emphasized that the proceedings were initiated prior to the circular's issuance and thus were not affected by it. The court also noted the statutory rights of sugarcane farmers under the Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953, which prioritize their dues. Ultimately, the court upheld the NCLT's decision to admit the Corporate Debtor into CIRP, allowing the process to continue while addressing the farmers' concerns regarding their payments.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Admission into CIRP - Validity of Proceedings - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 7 - The NCLT admitted the Corporate Debtor into CIRP based on established debt and default, fulfilling all criteria under the IBC. The court held that the petition was complete and valid, despite arguments regarding the RBI Circular's applicability (Paras 36-48).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the proceedings under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 were valid given the Supreme Court's ruling on the RBI Circular.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal upheld the NCLT's order admitting the Corporate Debtor into CIRP, stating that the debt and default were established independently of the RBI Circular.

Law Points

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
  • Debt and Default
  • RBI Circular
  • Statutory Dues
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (07) 91

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1404 of 2024 & 1405 of 2024

2024-07-11

Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Akash Jain, Ms. Abhipsa Sahu, Mr. Gopal Jain, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Divyam Agarwal, Mr. Mayank Ratnaparkhe, Ms. Priya Chauhan, Mr. Shivam Shukla, Mr. Anant Merathia, Ms. Ekta Choudhary, Ms. Rushali Sikand

Surender Pal Singh Mangat, Gursimran Kaur Mann

Oriental Bank of Commerce (Now Punjab National Bank), Mr. Anurag Goel, District Magistrate, Hapur, District Magistrate, Bahraich, Commissioner of Cane and Sugar, Uttar Pradesh

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the admission of Corporate Debtor into CIRP under IBC.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to challenge the NCLT's order admitting the Corporate Debtor into CIRP.

Filing Reason

Corporate Debtor's inability to repay debts led to the insolvency petition.

Previous Decisions

NCLT admitted the Corporate Debtor into CIRP based on established debt and default.

Issues

Validity of proceedings under Section 7 of the IBC given the Supreme Court's ruling on the RBI Circular. Priority of farmers' dues under the Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the proceedings were invalid due to the Supreme Court's ruling on the RBI Circular. Respondents contended that the proceedings were initiated prior to the circular and thus valid.

Ratio Decidendi

The proceedings under Section 7 of the IBC were valid as they were initiated prior to the RBI Circular's issuance, and the debt and default were clearly established.

Judgment Excerpts

The NCLT has admitted the Corporate Debtor in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The application under Section 7 has been filed by the bank on 05.09.2018. The impugned circular will have to be declared as ultra vires as a whole, and be declared to be of no effect in law. The proceedings initiated under Section 7 of the IBC only because of the operation of the impugned RBI Circular were declared to be non-est.

Procedural History

The NCLT admitted the Corporate Debtor into CIRP on 11.07.2024 following a petition by Oriental Bank of Commerce. Appeals were filed challenging this admission.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 7
  • Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953: Section 16, Section 17
  • Banking Regulation Act, 1949: Section 35AA, Section 35AB
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Design Infringement Suit — Whirlpool's Registered Designs for Washing Machine Held Prima Facie Valid and Infringed by Videocon's 'Pebble' Model. The Court found that the Defendant's product was a clear...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Disciplinary Action Case Against Bank Employee. The appellate authority's imposition of removal was found to be beyond its powers under the applicable service rules.