National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Appeal in Insolvency Matter — Upholds Resolution Plan Conditions. The court set aside the order directing the appellant to pay the balance amount with interest, affirming that delays in property vacation should not affect the implementation schedule of the resolution plan.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by Sonal Sumit Mehta, represented by Vikas Jain, against an order dated 01.06.2026, which directed her to pay the balance resolution amount within 45 days with interest at 12% per annum. The resolution plan had been accepted by the adjudicating authority on 23.02.2026, allowing 90 days for the appellant to deposit Rs. 18,81,00,000, of which Rs. 4,20,43,964 had already been paid. The appellant contended that despite the upfront payment, possession of the property located at S P – 2, RIICO Industrial Area, Kilkipura, Shivdaspura, Jaipur, was not handed over as stipulated in the resolution plan. The plan specified that possession would be granted upon payment of the upfront amount, but the release of charge would occur only after full payment. The appellant argued that any delay in vacating the property should not count against the implementation schedule of the resolution plan. The Monitoring Committee's counsel agreed with the appellant's submissions. The Tribunal ultimately set aside the impugned order regarding the payment direction, allowing the appeal and affirming the need for strict adherence to the resolution plan's conditions, including the exclusion of any additional time required for property vacation from the implementation period.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Implementation of Resolution Plan - Compliance with Conditions - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section Not Mentioned - The court held that the appellant should not be compelled to pay the balance amount with interest as it contradicts the resolution plan approved by the adjudicating authority. The court emphasized that any delay in vacating the property should be excluded from the implementation period of the resolution plan (Paras 9-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the direction to pay the balance amount with interest contravenes the approved resolution plan.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal set aside the impugned order directing the appellant to deposit the balance amount within 45 days with interest, allowing the appeal and affirming adherence to the resolution plan's conditions.

Law Points

  • Insolvency resolution
  • possession of assets
  • implementation schedule
  • interest on payment
  • exclusion of delay
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (07) 90

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1262 of 2026

2026-07-17

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Barun Mitra

Mr. Anurag Kalavatiya, Ms. Parul Singhal, Mr. Nipun Gautam, Mr. Abhishek Anand

Sonal Sumit Mehta

Chirag R. Shah

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against an order related to the payment of balance resolution amount in insolvency proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside the order directing payment of balance amount with interest.

Filing Reason

The appellant contended that the order contradicted the approved resolution plan.

Previous Decisions

The resolution plan was accepted on 23.02.2026, allowing time for payment.

Issues

Whether the payment direction contravenes the resolution plan Whether delays in property vacation affect the implementation schedule

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the payment direction contradicts the resolution plan Respondent's counsel agreed with the appellant's submissions

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized that compliance with the resolution plan is paramount and that any delays in property vacation should not penalize the Successful Resolution Applicant in terms of the implementation schedule.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal is against an impugned order dated 01.06.2026 The resolution plan was accepted by the adjudicating authority on 23.02.2026 The appeal is thus allowed and it is directed the strict observance of the resolution plan

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against an order directing payment of the balance resolution amount with interest, following the acceptance of the resolution plan on 23.02.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside Condition for Bail in Cheating Case — Emphasizes Distinction Between Criminal and Civil Proceedings. The High Court's imposition of a monetary condition for anticipatory bail was found to be excessive and inappropriate, und...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Procedure Case Concerning Extension of Time for Payment of Court Fee — Sets Aside High Court's Peremptory Dismissal. Peremptory Order Requiring Payment of Deficit Court Fee Within Three Months Did Not Bar High C...