National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal of Operational Creditor in Insolvency Case — Liability for Outstanding Dues Affirmed.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arose from an order dated 27.05.2025 by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Guwahati Bench, directing the Appellant, Assam Power Distribution Company Ltd., to pay ₹ 37,66,906.80 to the Liquidator of Brahmaputra Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. The Appellant contended that the same group of companies owed it ₹ 9,07,03,124, arguing that the Corporate Debtor should be treated as part of a single economic entity under the Group of Companies Doctrine. The Respondent, acting as Liquidator, maintained that the Appellant had admitted its liability and failed to pay despite multiple reminders. The NCLT had previously initiated a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor on 18.11.2022, followed by a liquidation order on 13.10.2023. The Appellant's claims for set-off were rejected on the grounds that the Corporate Debtor and other group entities were separate legal entities, each undergoing distinct liquidation processes. The court emphasized that the principle of set-off under Regulation 29 of the Liquidation Process Regulations applies only to mutual dealings between the same parties, which was not the case here. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, affirming the NCLT's order and the Appellant's liability to pay the outstanding dues.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Liability of Operational Creditor - Outstanding Dues - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 60(5) - The Appellant was directed to pay outstanding dues of ₹ 37,66,906.80 to the Liquidator despite claims against other group entities, as the Corporate Debtor is a separate legal entity. The court held that the Appellant's argument for set-off based on group identity was not tenable under the law (Paras 30-41).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Appellant is liable to pay the outstanding dues to the Respondent despite the applicability of the Group of Companies Doctrine and Regulation 29 of the Liquidation Process Regulations.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was dismissed, affirming the NCLT's order directing the Appellant to pay ₹ 37,66,906.80 along with applicable interest from 31.12.2014 to the Liquidator of Brahmaputra Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd.

Law Points

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • 2016
  • set-off
  • mutual dealings
  • separate legal entities
  • liquidation process regulations
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (07) 89

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1205 of 2025

2026-07-03

Justice N Seshasayee, Arun Baroka, Indevar Pandey

Mr. Nalin Kohli, Mr. Anshul Malik, Mr. Ayuushman Arora, Mr. Aditya Rathee, Mr. Shaunak Mita, Mr. Saurav Jain

M/s Assam Power Distribution Company Ltd.

Mrs. Meena Sureka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the order of NCLT regarding outstanding dues in insolvency proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to overturn the NCLT's order directing payment of dues.

Filing Reason

Dispute over liability for outstanding dues amidst claims against other group entities.

Previous Decisions

NCLT had previously ordered liquidation and directed payment of dues.

Issues

Whether the Appellant is liable to pay the outstanding dues despite claims against other group entities. Applicability of the Group of Companies Doctrine and Regulation 29 of the Liquidation Process Regulations.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued for set-off based on group identity and mutual dealings. Respondent maintained that the Corporate Debtor is a separate legal entity and the Appellant admitted liability.

Ratio Decidendi

The principle of set-off under Regulation 29 applies only to mutual dealings between the same parties, and the Corporate Debtor is a separate legal entity distinct from other group entities.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appellant was directed to pay outstanding dues of ₹ 37,66,906.80 to the Liquidator despite claims against other group entities. The plea of set-off is not available if different parties are involved. The Corporate Debtor retains its nature and character as a separate juristic entity.

Procedural History

The NCLT initiated a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process on 18.11.2022, followed by a liquidation order on 13.10.2023, leading to the appeal against the order dated 27.05.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 60(5), Section 35, Section 53
  • IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016: Regulation 29
  • Electricity Act, 2003: Section 173, Section 174
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appellant's Specific Performance Suit for Lack of Readiness and Willingness — Agreement Holder Not Entitled to Equitable Relief. Concurrent findings affirmed that appellant failed to prove readiness and willingness un...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Conditional Order Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Eviction Suit. Court upholds condition of depositing arrears of rent as a valid exercise of discretion under Order IX Rule 13 of CPC.