National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal of Homebuyer in Insolvency Matter — Claim Lacked Evidence.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from an appeal filed by a homebuyer against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) which dismissed his application under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellant, Sanjeev Bhatjiwale, claimed to have paid Rs. 36,87,900 for a flat in a real estate project developed by the corporate debtor, but the payment was made in cash to an operational creditor rather than directly to the corporate debtor. The corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) was initiated on 17.03.2022, with the last date for claim submission being 14.04.2022, which the appellant missed. The resolution plan was approved on 05.04.2024, after which the appellant filed his claim on 27.11.2024. The NCLT found that the appellant's claim lacked evidence of payment to the corporate debtor and that the resolution professional's role was limited to collating claims based on submitted evidence. The court noted that the appellant's reliance on previous judgments did not establish his status as a financial creditor without proof of disbursement. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as the resolution plan had already been implemented, and the appellant had no right to challenge it at that stage.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Claim Submission - Validity of Claim Post-Resolution Plan Approval - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 60(5) - The appellant's claim as a homebuyer was dismissed as he failed to file a claim before the resolution plan was approved, and lacked evidence of payment to the corporate debtor. The court held that the resolution professional's duty is limited to collating claims based on submitted evidence, and the absence of proof of disbursement rendered the claim invalid (Paras 10-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant's claim as a financial creditor was valid despite not filing a claim before the approval of the resolution plan.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was dismissed as the appellant failed to establish his claim as a financial creditor due to lack of evidence and late submission of the claim after the resolution plan was approved and implemented.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • financial creditor status
  • claim submission
  • burden of proof
  • resolution plan approval
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (07) 71

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 596 of 2026

2026-07-23

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Barun Mitra, Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Tarak Damani, Mr. Ayush J. Rajani, Ms. Khushboo Shah

Sanjeev Bhatjiwale

Chhaya Gupta & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of application in insolvency proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Recognition of claim as an allottee of the corporate debtor.

Filing Reason

Claim was dismissed for lack of evidence and late submission.

Previous Decisions

NCLT dismissed the application based on absence of claim filing before resolution plan approval.

Issues

Validity of claim post-resolution plan approval Burden of proof for financial disbursement

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that he should be recognized as a financial creditor despite not filing a claim in time. Respondents contended that the claim was invalid as it was not submitted before the resolution plan was approved.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the burden of proof lies with the claimant to establish financial disbursement, and the resolution professional's role is limited to collating claims based on submitted evidence.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appellant's claim hinges on alleged payments of Rs. 36,87,900/- by cash. The burden lies upon the claimant to establish financial disbursement. The status of the Applicant as homebuyers is not evident from the allotment letter & affidavit stating the manner of payment.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the NCLT's order dismissing the appellant's application under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which was based on the failure to file a claim before the approval of the resolution plan.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 60(5)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals as Fraudulent Due to Fabricated Vakalatnama and Forgery of Appellant's Signature. Court Initiates Contempt Proceedings Against Advocates and Notary for Misusing Legal Process to File SLP Without Appellant's Consent.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Case — Upholds Specific Performance of Sale Agreement. The court found the appellant's representation regarding joint family property unsubstantiated, affirming the enforceability of the sale agree...