National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Disposes Appeals Regarding License Extension. The Tribunal allowed the appellant to file for further extension of License No. 41 of 2018, recognizing the prior extensions granted by the Directorate of Town & Country Planning, Haryana.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved two appeals concerning the extension of License No. 41 of 2018, filed by Bishwanath Traders and Investment Ltd. and Ashish Singh, the erstwhile Resolution Professional for Vibrant Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. The appeals were against an order dated 04.11.2025 from the Learned Adjudicating Authority, which had declined the request for exclusion of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) period for the license. The appellant's counsel highlighted that despite the rejection, the Directorate of Town & Country Planning, Haryana had initially extended the license until 15.06.2026 and later until 15.06.2027. The appellant sought permission to file for further extension of the license, which the court found reasonable. The respondent's counsel acknowledged the extensions granted. The Tribunal allowed the request for the appellant to file an application for further extension and disposed of the appeals accordingly, also addressing pending applications. The court emphasized the importance of considering the extension favorably in light of the previous extensions granted.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - License Extension - Authority to Extend License - Companies Act, 2013 - The court allowed the appellant to file an application for further extension of License No. 41 of 2018, acknowledging that the license had been extended previously and should be considered favorably by the Directorate of Town & Country Planning, Haryana. Held that the extension serves the purpose of the license and is in the interest of justice (Paras 4-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the extension of License No. 41 of 2018 can be granted despite the rejection of the application by the Adjudicating Authority.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal allowed the appellant to file an application for further extension of License No. 41 of 2018 and disposed of the appeals accordingly.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • License validity
  • Extension of license
  • Adjudicating Authority's powers
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (07) 68

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 46 of 2026 and No. 55 of 2026

2026-07-14

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Barun Mitra

Mr. K. Datta, Mr. Anand M. Mishra, Mr. Shekhar Raj Sharma, Ms. Nidhi Narwal, Mr. Abhishek Parmar

Bishwanath Traders and Investment Ltd., Ashish Singh

Directorate of Town and Country Planning Haryana

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the order of the Adjudicating Authority regarding license extension.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought permission to file for further extension of License No. 41 of 2018.

Filing Reason

The initial application for exclusion of the CIRP period was rejected.

Previous Decisions

The Adjudicating Authority had previously declined the request for exclusion of the CIRP period.

Issues

Whether the extension of License No. 41 of 2018 can be granted despite the rejection of the application by the Adjudicating Authority.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant's counsel argued for the necessity of further extension of the license. The respondent's counsel acknowledged the previous extensions granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal recognized the authority of the Directorate of Town & Country Planning to extend licenses and emphasized the need for favorable consideration of such applications.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeal is confined strictly to preliminary aspect of the increase of the validity period of License No.41 of 2018. We allow the request as made by the Learned Senior Counsel for the Appellant herein and accordingly, the Appeal stands disposed of.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against an order dated 04.11.2025 from the Learned Adjudicating Authority, which declined the request for exclusion of the CIRP period for License No. 41 of 2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal by Aided School Against Eviction from Natham Land for Unauthorized Commercial Use. Court Holds That Natham Land Reserved for Residential Purposes Cannot Be Occupied for Running School, Upholds Lease Arrears Demand a...
Related Judgement
High Court Rajasthan High Court Reviews Writ Petition Challenging GST Circular on Annuity Payments for Road Access and Recovery Order. Petitioner contended that Circular No.150/6/2021 could not override statutory exemption Notification No.12/2017 Entry 23A and ...