National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Upholds Order for Disclosure of Financial Information in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process — Clarifies Scope of Information Requests.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by Mega Mall Management Services Pvt. Ltd. against an order from the National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata, which directed the Appellant to disclose financial details related to rent and parking income from Avani Riverside Mall for the financial years 2021-22 and 2022-23. The dispute arose during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Avani Projects & Infrastructures Ltd., where the Resolution Professional contended that information regarding the mall's revenues was necessary for the successful completion of the CIRP. The Appellant argued that it was an independent third-party entity with no financial or operational nexus to the Corporate Debtor after the execution of agreements dated 31.01.2018, which they claimed novated the previous arrangements. The Appellant sought to set aside the Tribunal's order, asserting that it compelled disclosure without establishing any ownership or financial interest of the Corporate Debtor in the mall. The Appellant's submissions included references to previous orders and agreements, emphasizing that the Corporate Debtor had no rights to the revenues generated from the mall. The Respondent, however, maintained that the Corporate Debtor had a continuing interest in the mall's revenues and that the agreements executed in 2018 were suspect, given the ongoing winding-up proceedings against the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal noted that the impugned order did not determine ownership or entitlement but merely required the Appellant to furnish requested information. The court emphasized that the Resolution Professional's request for financial information was legitimate and necessary for the CIRP, and the Appellant's claims of being a third party were insufficient to deny disclosure. Ultimately, the Tribunal upheld the order for disclosure, reinforcing the obligations of parties involved in the CIRP to cooperate fully with the Resolution Professional.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Disclosure of Financial Information - Obligation to Disclose - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 19 - The court held that the Resolution Professional is entitled to seek information related to revenues generated from the mall, as it is essential for the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, and the Appellant's refusal to disclose such information was unjustified (Paras 33-40).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Appellant was justified in refusing to disclose financial information related to the Corporate Debtor's assets during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal upheld the order directing the Appellant to furnish details of rent and parking income collected from Avani Riverside Mall for the specified financial years, emphasizing the necessity of such information for the CIRP.

Law Points

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • 2016
  • Corporate Debtor
  • Resolution Professional
  • disclosure of financial information
  • third-party obligations
  • contractual arrangements
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (07) 66

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 1236 of 2025

2026-07-06

Indevar Pandey

Mr. Mainak Bose, Mr. Anirban Ghosh, Mr. Siddhant Upmanyu, Mr. Rishav Banerjee, Mr. Supriyo Gole, Mr. Arijit Mazumdar, Ms. Madhuja Barman, Ms. Anoushka Dey, Mr. Moulinath Moitra

Mega Mall Management Services Pvt. Ltd.

Ajay Kumar Agarwal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against an order directing disclosure of financial information in CIRP.

Remedy Sought

Setting aside of the order directing disclosure of financial information.

Filing Reason

Dispute over the necessity and legitimacy of financial information disclosure.

Previous Decisions

Previous orders directed cooperation and examination of ownership records.

Issues

Whether the Appellant was justified in refusing to disclose financial information Whether the Resolution Professional's request for information was legitimate

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued it was an independent third party with no nexus to the Corporate Debtor. The Respondent contended that the Corporate Debtor had a continuing interest in the mall's revenues.

Ratio Decidendi

The Resolution Professional is entitled to seek information necessary for the CIRP, and parties involved must cooperate fully, regardless of claims of third-party status.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned order does not determine ownership of Avani Riverside Mall. The request for such information is therefore directly connected with the discharge of statutory duties.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against an order dated 18.06.2025 from the National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata, which directed the Appellant to disclose financial information during the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 19, Section 60, Section 45, Section 49, Section 66
  • Companies Act, 1956: Section 441, Section 531
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Scheme — Upholds Validity of Development Agreement and Consent Terms. Court holds that slum dwellers who have given consent for rehabilitation cannot later challenge the scheme, a...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Appellate Court's Order Directing Deposit of Fair Market Rent as Pre-condition for Stay of Eviction Decree in License Case. The court held that the principle of Atma Ram Properties applies to licens...