National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Appeal in Insolvency Proceedings — Denial of Opportunity to File Reply Set Aside.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arose from an order dated 08.12.2025 by the National Company Law Tribunal, which closed the Appellant's right to file a reply in insolvency proceedings initiated by the Respondent. The Appellant, Hannu Steels Private Limited, entered into a License User Agreement with Rathi Powertech Global Private Limited, which later led to disputes over unpaid license fees. The Appellant terminated the agreement citing a closure order from the Commission for Air Quality Management. The Respondent filed an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, claiming operational debt due to unpaid fees. The Appellant's counsel failed to file a reply within the granted time, leading to the closure of the right to respond. The Appellant contended that this closure denied it a reasonable opportunity to be heard due to its previous counsel's negligence. The Respondent argued that the Appellant was aware of the proceedings and failed to comply with judicial directions. The Tribunal analyzed the procedural discretion exercised by the Adjudicating Authority and the principles of natural justice, ultimately deciding that the Appellant should be granted one final opportunity to file its reply, as the denial of such an opportunity could lead to serious civil consequences. The appeal was allowed, and the order closing the right to file a reply was set aside, allowing the Appellant to present its defence (Paras 1-62).

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Right to File Reply - Closure of Right to File Reply - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 9 - The Appellant's right to file a reply was closed by the Adjudicating Authority due to non-filing despite opportunities. The Tribunal held that the Appellant should be afforded a final opportunity to present its defence, emphasizing the importance of natural justice in insolvency proceedings (Paras 60-61).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order closing the Appellant's right to file a reply suffers from any legal infirmity warranting interference.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the order closing the Appellant's right to file a reply, and granted the Appellant one final opportunity to file its reply before the Adjudicating Authority within a time-bound schedule.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • natural justice
  • procedural discretion
  • sufficient cause
  • timely filing of replies
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (07) 62

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 124 of 2026

2026-07-06

Indevar Pandey, Justice N. Seshasayee

Mr. Manan Batra, Mr. Abhishek Chhabra, Mr. Arun Bhattacharya, Mr. Karan Gandhi

Hannu Steels Private Limited

Rathi Powertech Global Private Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against closure of right to file reply in insolvency proceedings.

Remedy Sought

The Appellant sought to restore its right to file a reply.

Filing Reason

The Appellant contended that the closure denied it a reasonable opportunity to be heard.

Previous Decisions

The Adjudicating Authority closed the Appellant's right to file a reply due to non-filing despite opportunities.

Issues

Whether the closure of the right to file a reply was justified. Whether the Appellant was denied a reasonable opportunity to present its defence.

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued that the closure was due to negligence of its previous counsel. The Respondent contended that the Appellant was aware of the proceedings and failed to comply with judicial directions.

Ratio Decidendi

The principles of natural justice require that a party should be afforded a meaningful opportunity to present its defence before serious civil consequences ensue, and procedural laws are intended to facilitate adjudication, not obstruct it.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appellant is entitled to one final opportunity to file its Reply before the Adjudicating Authority subject to appropriate conditions. The principles of natural justice require that before serious civil consequences ensue, a party should ordinarily be afforded a meaningful opportunity to present its defence. We clarify that we express no opinion whatsoever on the merits of these contentions.

Procedural History

The appeal arose from an order dated 08.12.2025, where the Adjudicating Authority closed the Appellant's right to file a reply due to non-filing despite granted opportunities.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 9, Section 61(2)
  • Commission for Air Quality Management in National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas Act, 2021: Section 12(2)(xi)
  • Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023: Section 63
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act Despite Dismissal for Default — Magistrate Has Inherent Power to Restore Complaint Dismissed Under Section 256 CrPC
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal and Dismisses Suit for Declaration of Illegal Removal, Holding that Past Record Consideration for Lesser Penalty Does Not Require Fresh Show Cause Notice. Omission to Mention Past Record in Show Cause Notice Not Fa...