NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Matter Due to Lack of Aggrieved Status. Appellant's Claim Dismissed as Not Aggrieved by the Adjudicating Authority's Order.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by the Assistant Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise against the dismissal of a claim by the Adjudicating Authority in the context of insolvency proceedings concerning AGS Transact Technologies Ltd. The appellant had previously lost sales tax claims, which were pending adjudication before the Bombay High Court. Following this, the appellant submitted a claim to the Resolution Professional, which was rejected. The appellant then approached the Adjudicating Authority through I.A. No.536 of 2026, seeking to keep the claim open pending the outcome of the High Court proceedings. However, the Adjudicating Authority dismissed the application, leading to the current appeal. The Tribunal assessed whether the appellant could be considered aggrieved by the dismissal, ultimately concluding that the appellant was not aggrieved since the order was obtained at its instance. The Tribunal acknowledged that the claim was still under consideration by the Bombay High Court and directed the Resolution Professional to verify if the resolution plan included provisions for contingent claims, emphasizing that this would not impede the approval of the plan. The appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Adjudicating Authority's Jurisdiction - Appellant's Status as Aggrieved Party - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - The appellant's claim was dismissed by the Adjudicating Authority, which the appellant challenged, but the Tribunal found that the appellant was not aggrieved as the order was obtained at its instance. The Tribunal noted that the matter was still sub judice before the Bombay High Court and directed the resolution professional to check for provisions regarding contingent claims in the resolution plan without delaying its approval (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant is a person aggrieved by the Adjudicating Authority's order dismissing the claim.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, concluding that the appellant was not aggrieved by the Adjudicating Authority's order. It directed the Resolution Professional to check for contingent claims in the resolution plan without delaying its approval.

Law Points

  • Insolvency claims
  • Adjudicating Authority's jurisdiction
  • Contingent claims in resolution plans
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (07) 59

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No.1011 of 2026

2026-07-06

Justice N. Seshasayee, Barun Mitra

Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey, Mr. Karan Khetani, Mr. Vivek Sharma, Mr. Saksham Sharma, Mr. Mathy Kutty, Mr. Yahya Batatawala

Assistant Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise

Shri Brijendra Kumar Mishra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of claim in insolvency proceedings

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to challenge the dismissal of its claim

Filing Reason

Claim was rejected by the Resolution Professional

Previous Decisions

Claim pending adjudication before the Bombay High Court

Issues

Whether the appellant is aggrieved by the dismissal of the claim Whether contingent claims are addressed in the resolution plan

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued it was aggrieved by the dismissal Respondent contended the order was obtained at the appellant's instance

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant was not considered aggrieved as the order was obtained at its instance, and the matter was still sub judice before the Bombay High Court.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant herein has lost twice vis-à-vis his sales tax claims and the matter is now pending adjudication before the Bombay High Court. We do not consider the appellant to be a person aggrieved inasmuch as the Order has been obtained at its instance. The appeal is dismissed.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a claim with the Resolution Professional, which was rejected. The appellant then moved the Adjudicating Authority in I.A. No.536 of 2026, which dismissed the application, leading to the current appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Challenge to Maintenance Order Under Domestic Violence Act. Concurrent Findings of Domestic Violence and Entitlement to Maintenance Under Sections 12, 18, 19, 20, 22 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals for Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement — No Merit Found. Lok Adalat Settlements Alone Insufficient for Compensation Determination.