NCLAT Quashes Order for Reconsideration of Share Valuation in Companies Act Matter Due to Lack of Fair Hearing. The court emphasized the necessity of providing the appellant with the valuation report and affidavit to ensure adherence to natural justice principles under Section 230 and Section 424 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a company appeal concerning the valuation of shares held by the appellant, Hemendra Aran, in Greenwood Research & Management Ltd. The appellant contested an order from the NCLT Mumbai Bench regarding the acquisition of 21,355 shares at a specified valuation. The NCLT had based its decision on a valuation report submitted on 06.11.2025 and an affidavit filed on 17.02.2026, which the appellant claimed were not provided to him prior to the decision. The appellant argued that the reliance on these documents without giving him an opportunity to contest them rendered the NCLT's judgment vitiated. The respondent's counsel contended that the earlier valuation report was more favorable to the appellant, thus no prejudice was caused. However, it was acknowledged that the appellant had not received the later documents, which led to a consensus that the impugned order should be quashed and the matter remitted back to the NCLT for reconsideration. The NCLAT emphasized the importance of adhering to the principles of natural justice and directed that the NCLT should decide the application afresh, considering the implications of the new evidence, within four months of receiving the certified copy of the order.

Headnote

A) Companies Law - Valuation Report - Right to Fair Hearing - Companies Act, 2013, Section 230, 424 - The court held that the appellant was not provided the valuation report and supporting affidavit prior to the impugned order, violating principles of natural justice. The order was quashed and the matter was remitted back for reconsideration with the opportunity for the appellant to contest the new evidence (Paras 8-9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant was denied a fair opportunity to contest the valuation report and affidavit before the NCLT.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The NCLAT quashed the NCLT's order dated 10.06.2026 and remitted the matter back for reconsideration, emphasizing the need for the appellant to have access to the valuation report and affidavit to ensure a fair hearing.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Valuation report
  • Companies Act
  • 2013
  • Section 230
  • Section 424
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (07) 47

COMP. APP. (AT) NO. 287 OF 2026

2026-07-24

Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Arun Baroka, Indevar Pandey

Adv. Anshuman Singh, Adv. Vaibhav Gaggar, Adv. Dhiraj M., Adv. Sanampreet Singh, Adv. Shreyas Lele, Adv. Shivani Shama, Adv. Suraj Dhawan, Adv. Abhishek Nair, Adv. Ketan Saraf

Hemendra Aran

Greenwood Research & Management Ltd & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against an order of the NCLT regarding share valuation and acquisition.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to quash the NCLT's order and remand the matter for reconsideration.

Filing Reason

The appellant claimed lack of opportunity to contest the valuation report and affidavit.

Previous Decisions

The NCLT had issued an order based on a valuation report and affidavit that were not provided to the appellant.

Issues

Denial of fair hearing Validity of valuation report

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the valuation report and affidavit were not provided prior to the NCLT's decision. The respondent contended that the earlier valuation was more favorable and no prejudice was caused.

Ratio Decidendi

The court underscored the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice, particularly the right to be heard before a decision is made that affects one's rights.

Judgment Excerpts

The order deserves to be quashed. The court held that the appellant was not provided the valuation report and supporting affidavit prior to the impugned order.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the NCLT's order dated 10.06.2026, which was based on a valuation report and affidavit submitted after the initial proceedings.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013: 230, 232, 234, 424
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Minister's Order Allotting Land Containing Water Body to Educational Society. Land Allotment Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 20(2) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 and Failure...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff in Commercial Dispute Based on Dishonoured Cheque and Delivery Documents. The court held that the defendants' defence regarding an earlier transaction was not a triable issue and did not...