National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Appellant to File Reply in Insolvency Matter Due to Technical Glitch. Delay in Filing Justified as E-filing Issues Arose at NCLT.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by Apollo Green Energy Ltd. against Power2SME Pvt. Ltd. challenging an order from the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) dated 27.05.2026, which closed the opportunity for the appellant to file a reply. The appellant contended that they were given only one opportunity of seven days to file the reply and faced a technical issue with the NCLT's e-filing system on 26.05.2026, which prevented timely submission. The appellant communicated this issue to the NCLT Registrar on the same day. The respondent argued for the prompt disposal of the petition, suggesting that the written submissions filed could be considered as the reply. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's claims regarding the technical difficulties and permitted the appellant to file the reply by 15.07.2026, while also requesting the NCLT to expedite the petition's disposal. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the assurance from the appellant not to seek adjournments in future hearings.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Condonation of Delay - Justification for Delay - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - The appellant's delay in filing the reply was due to a technical glitch at the NCLT's e-filing portal, which was communicated to the Registrar. The Tribunal allowed the appellant to file the reply, emphasizing the need for procedural fairness and the importance of allowing parties to present their case (Paras 1-11).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant was justified in the delay of filing the reply due to technical issues with the e-filing portal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal allowed the appellant to file the reply by 15.07.2026 and requested the NCLT to expedite the disposal of the petition.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing issues
  • opportunity to file reply
  • procedural fairness
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (07) 33

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1219 of 2026

2026-07-15

Justice Mohammad Faiz Alam Khan, Naresh Salecha

Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Aashish Kumar, Ms. Sanya Kumar, Mr. Harsh Jain, Mr. Chiranjeev Singh Marwah

Apollo Green Energy Ltd.

Power2SME Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against an order of the NCLT regarding the closure of the opportunity to file a reply.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought permission to file a reply to the petition.

Filing Reason

Delay in filing due to technical issues with the NCLT's e-filing portal.

Previous Decisions

NCLT had closed the opportunity for the appellant to file a reply.

Issues

Justification for delay in filing the reply Procedural fairness in allowing the appellant to present their case

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that technical issues prevented timely filing of the reply. Respondent argued for prompt disposal of the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and the right of parties to present their case, allowing for the filing of the reply despite the delay caused by technical issues.

Judgment Excerpts

The delay of three days which has occurred in filing the appeal has been sufficiently explained. We permit the appellant to file the reply (e-filing as well as physical filing) before the Ld. Adjudicating Authority by tomorrow i.e. 15.07.2026.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed challenging the NCLT's order which closed the opportunity for the appellant to file a reply. The appellant sought condonation of delay due to technical issues faced during e-filing.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Criminal Matter Following Compromise. Compromise Accepted as Dispute Primarily Civil in Nature.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Minister's Order Setting Aside Supersession of Market Committee. Minister's order set aside for being unreasoned and without consideration of material on record under Section 45 of the Maharashtra Ag...