National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Appellant to Rectify Defects in Reply Submission. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and the right to be heard under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by Apollo Green Energy Ltd. against an order from the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi, which closed the opportunity for the appellant to file a reply due to procedural defects. The appellant's counsel argued that the reply was filed online on 03.02.2026, but defects raised by the Registry were not timely addressed due to the negligence of the appellant's clerk. The respondent opposed the appeal, claiming that the defects were deliberately ignored to delay proceedings. The Tribunal noted that the defects were acknowledged and that the appellant had made efforts to comply with the requirements. The court allowed the appellant to rectify the defects within seven days and directed the respondent to file a rejoinder within the same timeframe. Additionally, the Tribunal imposed a cost of Rs. 25,000 to be deposited in the Prime Minister's Relief Fund, emphasizing that failure to comply would negate the benefits of the order. The appeal was disposed of with these directions.

Headnote

A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy - Procedural Fairness - Right to be Heard - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 9 - The appellant was denied the opportunity to file a reply due to procedural defects, which were not timely rectified. The court permitted the appellant to remove the defects within a stipulated time, emphasizing the importance of allowing parties to present their case fully. Held that procedural lapses should not deny the right to be heard (Paras 11-14).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant should be allowed to rectify defects in the reply submission after the opportunity to file was closed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal allowed the appellant to rectify the defects within seven days and directed the respondent to file a rejoinder within the same period. The appellant was also ordered to deposit Rs. 25,000 in the Prime Minister's Relief Fund within five days, failing which the benefits of the order would not be granted.

Law Points

  • IBC provisions
  • procedural fairness
  • opportunity to be heard
  • defects in filing
  • Adjudicating Authority's discretion
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (07) 25

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1076 of 2026

2026-07-22

Justice Mohammad Faiz Alam Khan, Naresh Salecha

Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Aashish Kumar

Apollo Green Energy Ltd.

Royal Cap House

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against an order closing the opportunity to file a reply.

Remedy Sought

Appellant seeks to rectify defects in the reply submission.

Filing Reason

The appellant filed a reply to a petition under Section 9 of the IBC.

Previous Decisions

The National Company Law Tribunal had closed the opportunity to file a reply due to defects.

Issues

Whether the appellant should be allowed to rectify defects in the reply submission after the opportunity to file was closed.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that defects were due to clerical negligence and sought another opportunity to file the reply. Respondent contended that the defects were deliberately ignored to delay proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and the right to be heard, allowing the appellant to rectify defects in their filing.

Judgment Excerpts

The opportunity of the Appellant/Respondent to file the reply was closed. We permit the Appellant to remove the defects raised by the Registry. The appellant shall deposit Rs. 25,000/- in the Prime Ministers Relief Fund.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the order dated 29.05.2026 of the National Company Law Tribunal, which closed the opportunity for the appellant to file a reply due to defects.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 9
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhancement Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence. Reference Court's reliance on unsubstantiated sale instances and potential value of land without proper proof held erroneou...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Initiates Suo Motu Criminal Contempt Proceedings Against Advocate. Written Material Scandalised the Court, Lowering its Dignity and Interfering with Administration of Justice, Violating Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.