National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Rectification of Typographical Errors in Insolvency Appeal Order. The Tribunal permitted the correction of party designations in the judgment to ensure accuracy and clarity in legal proceedings.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal involved an application for rectification of typographical errors in a previous order dated 25.03.2026 concerning Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 2273 of 2024. The applicant, Zen Agrifoods LLP, originally a respondent in the case, identified errors where it was incorrectly referred to as 'Respondent No.3' instead of 'Respondent No.2', which was Mr. Bismillahkhan Ayubkhan Pathan. The application sought to correct these references in the judgment to reflect the accurate designation of the parties involved. During the proceedings, the learned counsels for both sides were present, and the respondents expressed no objection to the proposed rectification. The Tribunal, upon reviewing the application and the absence of any opposition, granted the request to amend the order accordingly. The rectification was deemed necessary to maintain procedural fairness and accuracy in the judicial record. The Tribunal allowed the substitution of the terms as requested, ensuring that the order accurately represented the parties involved in the case. The decision was made by a bench comprising Justice N Seshasayee, Arun Baroka, and Indevar Pandey, and the order was issued on July 09, 2026.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Rectification of Orders - Typographical Errors - Companies Act, 2013 - The applicant sought rectification of typographical errors in the order dated 25.03.2026, specifically substituting references to 'Respondent No.3 i.e. Zen Agrifoods LLP' with 'Respondent No.2 i.e. Mr. Bismillahkhan Ayubkhan Pathan' in paragraphs 1 and 49. The court found no objection from the respondents and allowed the rectification as it served the interest of justice. Held that such corrections are permissible to ensure accuracy in judicial orders (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the typographical errors in the order dated 25.03.2026 can be rectified as requested by the applicant.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal allowed the application for rectification, substituting 'Respondent No.3 i.e. Zen Agrifoods LLP' with 'Respondent No.2 i.e. Mr. Bismillahkhan Ayubkhan Pathan' in the order dated 25.03.2026.

Law Points

  • Typographical errors
  • rectification of orders
  • procedural fairness
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (07) 7

I.A. No. 4112 of 2026 in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 2273 of 2024

2026-07-09

Justice N Seshasayee, Arun Baroka, Indevar Pandey

Ms. Anushree Kapadia, Ms. Pragya Jaishwal, Mr. Pranay Bhardwaj, Ms. Honey Satpal, Mr. Akash Agarwalla, Mr. Nipun Singhvi, Mr. Aman, Ms. Saumitra

Zen Agrifoods LLP

Atul Babulal Prajapati, Pinal Prajapati, Suhas Dinkar Bhattbhatt, Bismillahkhan Ayubkhan Pathan, ZEN Fincorp Private Ltd

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for rectification of typographical errors in a previous order.

Remedy Sought

Zen Agrifoods LLP sought to correct references in the judgment.

Filing Reason

To rectify inaccuracies in the designation of parties in the order.

Previous Decisions

An order dated 25.03.2026 was previously issued in the matter.

Issues

Rectification of typographical errors in judicial orders

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant requested correction of party designations due to typographical errors. The respondents had no objection to the proposed rectification.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that rectification of typographical errors in judicial orders is permissible to ensure accuracy and clarity in legal proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an application filed by the Applicant – Original Respondent No.3 i.e. Zen Agrifoods LLP bearing I.A. No. 4112 of 2026 in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 2273 of 2024. The Respondent has no objection, if the prayer is allowed.

Procedural History

The application for rectification was filed following the issuance of the order dated 25.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition for Caste Category Change in NEET-PG 2025 Application After Deadline. No provision exists for modification of category after last date of application, and the application process must attain finality.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Monthly-Rated Workmen's Rights in Industrial Disputes Act Case — Company Failed to Justify Change in Dearness Allowance System.